Evaluate offer, photovoltaic system technology

  • Erstellt am 2023-01-30 12:00:19

xMisterDx

2023-09-19 07:49:39
  • #1
Which I, by the way, very much welcome. I can practically smell the specialists who then charge their vehicles daily at the branch to cook and watch TV in the evening, while those who really need to charge because they drive a lot get left out...

And in general. The public charging infrastructure is intended for people who cannot charge at home or need to charge on the go.

Maybe leave the ego pig in the cage every now and then. It's better for society.
 

KoalasAreCute

2023-09-19 09:30:40
  • #2

I read somewhere an example scenario where you charge for free at work and then feed into the grid at home. Something about tax was the question.
 

andimann

2023-09-19 10:07:41
  • #3
Hello,



Yes, I have also seen a discussion in that direction somewhere. To be honest, it looked to me like the typical German "Let's invent some absurd special case to prevent something new" discussion.


    [*]Hardly any employer will provide _free_ charging options for a larger number of electric cars. Maybe 1-3 spots so they can present themselves as super green, but no more than that.
    [*]Such behavior would simply be theft and accordingly already very problematic from a labor law perspective. I might as well take pencils and printer paper from the office and sell them.

No one will probably do that at a paid charging station, who charges their car for 40 cents/kWh and then feeds the electricity back in for 8 cents/kWh?

Somewhere, there will certainly be some species who carry it through, but that will be a very rare exception. An electric car can usually only deliver 3.6 kW. At most, you can feed back max. 40 kWh at home overnight. With the current feed-in tariff, that’s about 3 euros/night. Is it worth risking your job for that?!?

Normally, such experts are already held back by colleagues who also want to charge and, above all, simply ask how it can be that the electric car is empty again every day when he only commutes between the office and home.

Best regards,

Andreas
 

xMisterDx

2023-09-19 10:28:03
  • #4
Well. For company vehicles with private use, it is actually cheaper for the employer if they are charged on-site instead of at the Supercharger for 50, 60 cents/kWh. Depending on the location, the prices paid are also not the same as those known from one’s own household. The medium-sized steel construction company does not pay 35 cents/kWh for its electricity...

Apart from that, I don’t think it’s a good idea to use your car battery for something like that, but everyone has to decide for themselves. As I said, I hardly believe that the manufacturers will still provide a warranty with excessive use. And with current (realistic) ranges of an ID.4 in winter of under 300km (not discharging below 20% and not charging over 80%, see VW battery care instructions), it would be annoying if the battery only has 70% capacity after a few years, but is not replaced under warranty because it was constantly used as a home storage...

For good reason, Tesla uses old car batteries as storage... and not new ones.
 

sysrun80

2023-09-19 11:10:25
  • #5
It will not be free because that alone is a "monetary benefit". Whoever wants to enter this tax hell, please.

Regarding the charging infrastructure: time is money - fast chargers and generally public charging points are usually more expensive than electricity from one's own home installation. The open infrastructure must be maintained and supported - and a little profit should also remain - otherwise no one will build it.

And as long as the state keeps its fingers out of it, I think everything is fine.
 

kati1337

2023-09-19 11:31:04
  • #6

That's how it is.
The fear that someone could grab a crumb through the back door during bidirectional charging is typically German again. Simply ridiculous, and we're shooting ourselves in the foot once more.

The public charging infrastructure is actually okay for today's standards. We used it exclusively for a few months before our wallbox was operational. We just have to make sure to expand it according to new electric vehicle registrations.
I also find the prices okay, though somewhat high. But still cheaper than comparable fuel. The advantage is being back on the road quickly. At home, I charge almost for free, but it takes longer.
 

Similar topics
08.11.2013Electricity at the house connection for provider - Installation of server cabinet10
07.07.2016Electricity and water supply before construction begins?27
13.12.2016Lawn mower with electricity, battery, or petrol?47
08.08.2016Connection costs for telecom, cable, electricity10
10.10.2017New photovoltaic system with storage in single-family home - experiences39
17.05.2017Photovoltaics initially without storage54
03.07.2017Are the costs for the electricity house connection justified?10
06.02.2018Solar for hot water/heating or better photovoltaic for electricity?21
07.05.2020Collaboration of air-water heat pump, photovoltaic system, and storage38
08.05.2020Heat pump + photovoltaic system with or without storage11
13.08.2020Is energy storage also unprofitable for electric cars? Costs of wallbox + storage79
28.03.2021Strom-Cloud experiences vs. feed-in tariff?94
04.11.2020Solar system with storage in the garage, possible?28
28.03.2022Photovoltaics are coming up - Options: 19 kWp, 25 kWp, 30 kWp, Storage?30
20.07.2022Waiving feed-in tariff, always feasible? Storage price?25
08.05.2023Evaluation of Photovoltaic Offer and Components34
17.10.2023Evaluation of Photovoltaic System Offer with Storage78
27.09.2024Offer for photovoltaic system including storage - Storage yes/no?44
22.07.2025Balcony power plant – with storage or without? Orientation?31

Oben