Evaluate offer, photovoltaic system technology

  • Erstellt am 2023-01-30 12:00:19

xMisterDx

2023-09-19 15:14:03
  • #1
No. The trick is to only keep fossil power plants or storage for 20-30% of peak demand. Otherwise, it becomes unaffordable. Just like the A39 near Wolfsburg, which completely goes under twice a day for 30-45 minutes, and the rest of the day you could, exaggeratedly speaking, play football on it. Apart from that, that would be a pretty harsh two-class society, don't you think? Those who have coal always get power, those who are poor can only watch TV when the sun shines or the wind blows. That won't work... it actually doesn’t anymore, see the survey results.
 

sysrun80

2023-09-19 15:17:30
  • #2
Again: It's not about having no electricity at all! It's about the fact that it is simply more expensive at certain times teurer ! Just like today on the stock market. All fixed contracts are just the average plus a safety margin. Yes, you can do that. But with a bit of regulation and clever behavior with flexible contracts, you can also save more. Those who don't want to because they are too lazy shouldn't complain either. That's what I'm getting at.
 

RotorMotor

2023-09-19 15:27:22
  • #3

In theory, you may be right.
In reality, unfortunately, it doesn't work... or only for very few.


Let's not argue now about night or evening. ;-)

If you're such a fan of storage, then calculate what it actually brings economically.
Or show what such a storage system brings to the environment.
Or show a charging and discharging curve, and then we'll compare it with energy-charts.

The storage would benefit the grid if it is controlled by the grid.
 

sysrun80

2023-09-19 15:28:48
  • #4
Interesting, it has been working for years with the neighbors in the north.
 

RotorMotor

2023-09-19 15:32:48
  • #5
Make that concrete. Which country. What works significantly better there from your point of view than here?
 

sysrun80

2023-09-19 15:36:21
  • #6


In Norway and Denmark, for example, dynamic electricity tariffs, including for household electricity, are very common and are also very well accepted. A few months ago, I also found an article that shows how this helps the power grid and can counteract a massive and thus expensive expansion.

But you can already see that it’s more about why something doesn’t work – even though others are already demonstrating it :cool:
 

Similar topics
10.10.2017New photovoltaic system with storage in single-family home - experiences39
17.05.2017Photovoltaics initially without storage54
10.06.2017Photovoltaic system with storage and additional solar required?12
05.03.2018Photovoltaic planning - possible retrofitting of battery storage13
31.07.2018Storage heats collector10
07.05.2020Collaboration of air-water heat pump, photovoltaic system, and storage38
05.05.2020Photovoltaic system + storage with or without cloud tariff13
08.05.2020Heat pump + photovoltaic system with or without storage11
13.08.2020Is energy storage also unprofitable for electric cars? Costs of wallbox + storage79
28.03.2021Strom-Cloud experiences vs. feed-in tariff?94
04.11.2020Solar system with storage in the garage, possible?28
09.11.2020Lower Saxony subsidizes photovoltaic storage20
07.11.2021Newly built single-family house - gas or air heat pump + photovoltaics + storage?168
16.07.2021Cost of photovoltaics with storage120
28.03.2022Photovoltaics are coming up - Options: 19 kWp, 25 kWp, 30 kWp, Storage?30
20.07.2022Waiving feed-in tariff, always feasible? Storage price?25
06.08.2022Savings photovoltaic system, storage, power cloud41
28.09.2022Screed execution in the attic - ceiling between the attic and living space16
17.10.2023Evaluation of Photovoltaic System Offer with Storage78

Oben