Deviation from the development plan in the new construction area is possible

So I think with "sock puppet," nice word by the way, you mean me? Well, at least better than "troll," which I personally find defamatory and disrespectful.

I find people unlikable who, out of arrogance and superiority, cannot accept other opinions and dismiss other arguments as empty because they are beyond their imagination. How should I call you now? Somehow I tend to see you as the biggest "troll" here, but as I said, I find that disrespectful!

And forgive me, you infallible surveying engineer, that I haven’t read all 19 pages and maybe, also because the thread is presented in such a fragmented way by the OP, have overlooked something.

The reason I haven’t responded to your (to me empty) posts so far is solely that there was nothing worth writing about.

BTT: I might join in again if there are new infos here.

Good night!

The information has passed me by until now.

It is also not relevant in my draft. The plot slopes down by about 1.4m over the first 15 meters, i.e. according to my draft up to the back edge of the building. One meter may be filled in so that at least half of the terrace is level with the ground. While the terrace gradually turns into a balcony towards the north, the terrain slopes gently down in a stepped manner towards the garden.

Do I understand correctly that I would then have one entrance from the garage and one in the south for the guests?

Yes.

As Alex 85 says, unfortunately the neighbor to the west could place his 3-meter-high garage right in front of my nose

Yes, if you call 6m "right in front of your nose".

and on top of that a 2m retaining wall

No. According to your statement, filling is only permitted up to the top edge of the finished floor. It definitely remains at the 3m of the garage.

that actually everything takes place on the ground floor, with the new proposal life takes place on 2 levels

It was your wish to have floor-to-ceiling windows with access to the garden. How that affects your life is entirely up to you.

And I still can't quite imagine the floor plan with this proposal

Your ground floor remains unchanged except for the passage from the storage room into the garage and the missing cloakroom window. We do not know your upper floor (or did I overlook it?). I do feel sorry about the photovoltaics. If only the ridge direction could still be turned...

What advantages does Escroda's proposal have?

My proposal solves all the problems you mentioned up to #85. It is approvable, it leaves the painstakingly developed floor plan untouched, and it can be implemented promptly.

So it is indeed really difficult to briefly explain all the problems here, the development plan has for example five pages...

Of course, I know the property inside and out and maybe sometimes we just talk past each other

The property to the west is higher than mine and if he fills the floor to an acceptable level and builds his garage 3 m high, the difference between my property and the roof of his garage is higher than 3 m

I will get in touch when I know more.

After the meeting with the authorities next week, if no solution is apparent, you should open a new thread with Lageplan1 (rejected by the municipality), Lageplan2 (rejected by the district office), excerpt from the development plan and complete textual regulations, your "must-haves" and a priority list of all other wishes.

I can only repeat, this also includes a plan of the property and the surrounding properties with contour lines and already existing houses, garages, etc. Possibly also 1 or 2 photos .. and as said, ideally everything together in one opening post of a thread. That way it can always be found again. .

Hmm... of course, it is advisable to read through the entire thread before contributing here. After all, this is not a collection thread.

However, I must also admit that I don’t remember exactly all the information that has been shared about the property, although I read a lot of it twice at the beginning.

I would like to point out, though, that you are allowed to fill in, provided you avoid retaining walls at the property boundary, meaning you leave the filling to the edge. And what concerns you also concerns the neighbor, namely also the prevention of retaining walls. How relevant this is for you now... I don’t know. But maybe for you.

If you visualize your house with a program, it can be helpful for you and also for others (e.g., us) if you also stake out your property, that is, fence it in. Then you can also see the effect of the proportions. Just a tip.
And if your program can also simulate shadows, then you can set and track the effects of the sun, right?! [emoji848]

the development plan has, for example, five pages...

These are significantly fewer than this thread has. And early knowledge of the five pages would have saved an estimated 10 pages of this thread.

At the time of purchase, these problems were also not apparent due to the ambiguous wording in the development plan.

If ambiguous wordings of considerable consequence need to be clarified, then a record of the conversation is made and confirmed by the participants. Then no one can later back out. Which wordings are ambiguous? And how did the municipality comment on them? How many people participated in the clarifying discussion? I cannot find any deficiencies in the development plan. It even contains a sectional diagram in which it is visually explained again where and how much must be filled in and where the reference heights are located.

and if he fills in the floor properly and builds his garage 3 m high

... then he is not allowed to do that because the BayBo also applies to him and his garage would then create setback areas, which, by the way, is also a legitimate point of criticism of my proposal, since a 9 m long garage can hardly be placed in such a way that the average wall height does not exceed 3 m due to the slope. I find it remarkable that a garage no longer than 9 m and at a distance of 6 m is unacceptable to you, while you want to impose on your northern neighbor a 12.2 m wide and 7.8 m + roof high building wall at a distance of 5 m.