Cultivation Planning / Change

  • Erstellt am 2017-08-03 10:08:30

Xorrhal

2017-08-07 08:32:26
  • #1


I don’t think so, even though building is very flexible here. The city’s power lines would have to be changed and everything. I can’t imagine that being economically feasible even remotely, if it’s allowed at all.



Looks really interesting. I like it too.
But the question is, where would we end up cost-wise? I get (now calculated with a bank’s professional assessment) about €150,000 to €200,000 for an extension (fully value-increasing). A "conversion" won’t be fully recognized as value-increasing, so I can only calculate with correspondingly less money. And that probably won’t be enough to move and newly support load-bearing walls, the exterior wall of the old building, etc.



Correct, as I said, I had the first bank appointment over the weekend.

The advisor discouraged me from a new build. At least under the conditions I mentioned – meaning selling the house with a €100,000 "profit," new build including land for €600,000. He said, purely bank-wise, that might be possible with some tricks and contortions, but then I would be at the absolute limit regarding monthly burden – and that with maybe three children, he strongly advised against it. It would be different with two children and if my wife would go back to full-time work – but even then, it would be a project not built on the strongest footing.

So a new build is feasible but too risky under the given conditions. If it were done, the new build including land, incidental building costs, granny flat, etc. would have to be reduced to a maximum of €500,000 – then it would be conceivable and also solidly financeable.

With the extension topic, it looked much better, and I also have an offer to finance an EXTENSION for around €150,000, which would fully fit into our budget (details see other thread).

He emphasized again that this applies to an extension, meaning measures that have an almost full value-increasing effect. Conversions in the old building stock only count partly (about 50%) as value increase – which, while not changing the monthly burden of financing, would simply no longer make loan collateralization possible.
 

Joedreck

2017-08-07 08:49:32
  • #2
I believe we have already given up on profitability anyway. Wouldn't it be time now to invest some money and consult an architect for advice? Because the further path obviously depends largely on the feasibility of a conversion (of whatever kind).
 

kaho674

2017-08-07 08:51:54
  • #3

I don’t want to sound arrogant, but I don’t think another floor plan can fit the 3 children’s rooms of reasonable size in the same area. But I have to say, I lived with my sister in one room until we were 10. That was great and worked excellently.
Maybe the architect or structural engineer can have a look at the matter. One or two columns in the room could even have a positive effect as room dividers between the kitchen/dining area and living area – possibly. But that it won’t be trivial structurally is something I can imagine. You’re right about that.
 

Xorrhal

2017-08-07 10:01:27
  • #4
We have an architect who is also a structural engineer. The original plan for the extension also comes from him.

Economic efficiency aside, it has to be feasible. If I have to borrow €20,000 more for it, that’s not a problem. The monthly burden is no problem at these levels. But the collateral is a problem – I won’t get €250,000 for the renovation if the house doesn’t increase in value by at least €200,000 as a result – and that is likely difficult to impossible.

The extension that creates an additional 60m² of living space for €150,000 is financeable – quite well, even.
A renovation including the extension that also creates 60m² of living space for €150,000 is therefore also financeable.

Only if the extension alone already costs €150,000, where is the budget for the renovation? And I can only get that up to say a maximum of €50,000. Given the changes that would have to be made, I simply consider that impossible. For €50,000 you don’t rebuild the entire structural engineering of the house, because nearly a whole house wall including roof and everything has to be torn down. Not to mention that in the old building there is underfloor heating everywhere with different heating circuits per room...

But I also admit that it is almost impossible to fit all that is needed only into the extension. Even if that is extended 3*10 meters to the rear ([planoben]).

The only thing that would be feasible in my eyes (whether it then looks nice is another issue) is to leave the old building completely as it is, except that Child 2 will get the new bathroom. Where in the extension the new bathroom would be ([planrechts]), there would be a slightly larger children’s room (4m*4m) than on the plan, and exactly on the other side ([planlinks]) the master bedroom (4m*4m) with direct access to the bathroom.

Because the extension is then enlarged to the rear by 3m*10m, the living/dining room would still have a size of 5m*7m and the kitchen would still have about 3m*5m. All just approximate figures.

I’ll try to draw it.
 

Joedreck

2017-08-07 10:16:24
  • #5
Well, if you have an architect, then just hire him for that.
An approvable extension that must fulfill the criteria x and y.
The old building may only be worked on minimally invasively.
Then he will make himself some thoughts and draw it for you.

You can draw back and forth here, but you have no certainty regarding the approval, even if something was approved once.
Even if you dismissed the idea of adding a story so easily, I wouldn't completely discard it. Maybe it's possible to convert the attic in such a way to accommodate the bedrooms there.
You have certain no-go's (which I don't want to judge), but that restricts your free thinking a lot. You are basically fixated on a single possibility and trying to push it through with a lot of back and forth.
A free mind that knows all the requirements would be a better contact person here.
 

kaho674

2017-08-07 10:30:10
  • #6

I don't understand why the roof is affected differently than in the architect's extension.

You mean it's cheaper for you to build another 3x10m = 30m² in addition, than to remove half the exterior wall and support it properly? *doubtfully scratching head*
 

Similar topics
16.05.2014What makes a new building expensive?20
27.06.2014Cost of extension to a single-family house - time span between building application and habitability?12
20.03.2015Basement for a small recording studio, or rather an extension?16
15.04.2016Costs for extension and partial modernization of existing property32
19.06.2016Cultivation EU / Roof structure extension upper floor - Which is more expensive?17
29.08.2016We are planning an extension24
23.03.2018House from the 1930s. Renovate or rebuild?25
09.07.2018Floor plan design single-family house (urban villa) approx. 140m² (3 children's rooms)42
23.10.2018New construction after triplet birth. Looking forward to your ideas.50
01.10.2018Renovation of a 1960s settlement house with extension - Feedback welcome*20
01.11.2019Ideas for floor plan adjustment of house with extension on the west slope13
07.01.2020Dear existing property with renovation or new construction37
13.01.2021Cost estimation for demolition and new construction75
23.01.2021Inheritance share, family property, expand living area25
26.03.2021Extension on an old building from 1965 with an additional storey43
19.03.2022Small cultivation planning - maximum 15 sqm20
28.01.2022Floor plan planning of an old building from the 1930s63
10.04.2023Renovate an old building or build new? Experiences?35
11.11.2024New construction or house purchase and renovation in Bavaria68
30.08.2024Renovation or demolition and new construction - decision support from the architect?25

Oben