kaho674
2017-08-07 17:09:33
- #1
Unfortunately, I am a structural idiot and probably completely lack imagination.
If you remove half of the exterior wall, the ceiling remains. This would have to be supported with beams, which might possibly be supported by an additional column. At least, that’s what I thought. The ceiling height also continues smoothly in the architect’s extension, so in my opinion the roof is subject to the same changes or non-changes as in the architect’s design. In other words: with or without the exterior wall, the roof and ceilings are the same in both designs. Where is my mistake in thinking?
And why you want to tear out the underfloor heating because of the wall is also unclear to me. You only need to reroute the supply line. It can’t be that difficult, can it?
Well, maybe the devil is in the details. The information is just too sparse. Best to talk to the architect. Maybe you’ll tell us what he says. That would be nice.
If you remove half of the exterior wall, the ceiling remains. This would have to be supported with beams, which might possibly be supported by an additional column. At least, that’s what I thought. The ceiling height also continues smoothly in the architect’s extension, so in my opinion the roof is subject to the same changes or non-changes as in the architect’s design. In other words: with or without the exterior wall, the roof and ceilings are the same in both designs. Where is my mistake in thinking?
And why you want to tear out the underfloor heating because of the wall is also unclear to me. You only need to reroute the supply line. It can’t be that difficult, can it?
Well, maybe the devil is in the details. The information is just too sparse. Best to talk to the architect. Maybe you’ll tell us what he says. That would be nice.