100% financing - I understand that!

  • Erstellt am 2020-04-23 17:19:43

Pinkiponk

2020-04-25 13:03:57
  • #1
Old versus young and women versus men are still missing.
 

Marit

2020-04-25 13:17:43
  • #2


The argument "why did I even study" is not made for the welfare of the child but only serves one's own benefit, the career!!!
 

saralina87

2020-04-25 13:44:44
  • #3


Strange, I usually perceive people from the East quite differently, but well, that is really a completely different topic. Personally, I make no distinction between woman and man, but the moment a couple says “we want a child,” the desire to engage with that child must be behind it – otherwise the decision doesn’t make any sense at all. But if a couple simultaneously works 70 to 80 hours a week, then simply the time to engage with the child is missing – that should actually burden someone and not be the goal to be pursued. For those who still want to live that way: Of course! I do not presume to judge whether that is great for the child or not (by the way, children are different) – but I would question the DESIRE for children. In my opinion, in such constellations, other needs are satisfied in the sense of “representing the perfect family.”
 

Maschi33

2020-04-25 14:04:15
  • #4
Please don't put words in my mouth. I "criticize" those situations where both go back to full-time work immediately after at most one year, even though there is no financial necessity. Sure, if, for example, you have nicely calculated your property through rose-colored glasses based on two full-time salaries, there is often no other choice, but I find that just as sad as the career hunters who think they could suffer any career disadvantage because of 2-3 years of part-time work to take care of their own offspring.
 

blubbernase

2020-04-25 14:05:22
  • #5
The thing is: There is enough research on the topic, all those biased anecdotes are not needed – this all reminds me of the violence discussion (I was beaten, it didn’t harm me). You can quite accurately tell who has been in daycare within the first 18 months based on the cortisol levels of teenagers. These stress levels persist throughout childhood. Children in longer and more extensive daycare (and I don’t mean grandma or anything like that, but a daycare center) under one year old are almost always worse off than comparison groups. From one year on, excellent care quality can at least ensure that the child does not develop worse than comparison groups. Only from 18–24 months does this balance out, but even then it highly depends on the quality of care and the child. Only after that do communicative developmental aspects promoted by daycare and such really come into effect.

But we are in Germany, and Haarer’s spirit still wanders through many children’s rooms here...

"The best place for the child is in its own room, where it then remains alone," Johanna Haarer also wrote in her 1934 guide The German Mother and Her First Child. If the child starts to cry or scream, one should ignore it: "Just don’t start taking the child out of bed, carrying it, rocking it, pushing it in a stroller, or holding it on your lap, not to mention nursing it. The child understands incredibly quickly that it only needs to scream to summon a sympathetic soul and become the object of such care. After a short time, it demands this attention as a right, giving no rest until it is carried, rocked, or pushed again – and the little but relentless household tyrant is complete!"

It is and remains creepy.
 

Worrier84

2020-04-25 14:35:54
  • #6
Thus, the theory that every thread eventually brings the Nazis into play is confirmed once again. In the end, no one cares who thinks what here. The posts are for the digital paper bin.
 
Oben