Why do the interpretations of people with basic knowledge contradict each other?
Some here say the bay window must not extend towards the neighbor because it is not mentioned in the development plan - however, the head of the building authority refers to the state building code where it is allowed.
You interpret the 1/3 bay window rule as valid within the building envelope - my architect is planning a larger bay window towards the garden within the building envelope.
You interpret the 1/3 bay window rule as applicable to the sum of all bay windows around the house - my architect is planning another bay window on the front side, also wider than 1/3 and also within the building envelope.
5 pages of expert opinions and I am basically as wise as before. Even the fact that I should best get the opinion of (another) architect I had expected beforehand.
Sorry, but clarity means something different to me.