11ant
2018-11-16 13:30:38
- #1
What contradiction is there in the development plan? Surely only can say in this forum: a boundary construction privilege usually applies only to the garage itself and a terrace would have to observe the boundary distance - however, we are talking about terraced housing here with a closed building style, which in this sense within the group of houses does not have a lateral building setback (and accordingly no height limit for boundary construction as such). I would therefore see the balustrade of the terrace as being allowed to reach up to the eaves height.Moreover, even within the building authority there was disagreement as to whether a roof terrace with a max height of 4m may be built on the garage, or whether the state building code applies, according to which only a max height of 3m is allowed as boundary construction. This is still being clarified because the development plan itself actually contradicts itself here.