Surveillance cameras: For / Against

  • Erstellt am 2019-12-16 14:55:34

ypg

2019-12-18 18:29:03
  • #1


Be glad: Neighbors are free of charge


They are called crooks' marks as chalk drawings or strokes on a wall.
Nowadays, small twigs are also sometimes simply left at the entrance.
 

ludwig88sta

2019-12-20 10:52:20
  • #2
I am allowed to post my own recordings on my own property unencrypted on the Internet as I please. Glorious GDPR or not. Neither the GDPR nor any other laws care about that.

Furthermore, a large part of nighttime burglars conduct a sort of reconnaissance before their act, and in that case an alarm system and/or surveillance cameras can very well deter the crime at that property.

It might be different with the currently topical twilight apartment burglars who usually strike between 3 and 6 pm, when everyone is most occupied with themselves (end of work, shopping, cooking, etc.). But even then, I think that alarm systems and surveillance cameras, unless they are hidden, tend to deter rather than having none at all.

Also, with decoys there are probably higher quality ones that you would not recognize as such from the outside! It's always a matter of money, analogous to the quality of the real cameras.
 

Tassimat

2019-12-20 10:57:50
  • #3
No, because you are violating the intruder's personal rights. No joke. On top of that, private individuals are not allowed to initiate wanted notices. A much more practical problem is that you post pictures of the mail carrier and other visitors on the internet. That is not allowed at all.
 

guckuck2

2019-12-20 16:54:37
  • #4


Completely wrong.
It affects both the rights of the data subjects under the GDPR and the right to one's own image under personality rights.

Your property is not a lawless space where only you make the rules. Get away from this way of thinking quickly, as it is an excellent breeding ground for fruitful neighborhood disputes.
 

Scout

2019-12-20 21:18:50
  • #5
He meant [Gesetzbuch] and [Paragraph] for your statement.
 

ypg

2019-12-20 22:21:32
  • #6
Just without people. That is self-evident and has been debated or discussed for years. Search yourself! Data protection... right to one's own image... Just read it recently again..
 

Similar topics
17.04.2016Value of land and bungalow B5511
08.11.2010Offer for a semi-detached house with land, okay?11
07.07.2011Financing land now, house in 6 months?17
14.08.2012Build a home? Land in prospect19
25.03.2012Land now - house construction next year23
31.05.2012Financing of the property: Does the entire financing need to be secured?11
04.09.2012Land paid - Building with an additional loan?16
02.09.2013Angular bungalow on 800m² plot - financially feasible?16
09.02.2013What do you think of this property?11
28.05.2013I am getting a plot of land as a gift. How do I finance the construction?16
03.06.2013Buying land from father - building a house yes or no?11
01.08.2013Is the property right for us?15
22.08.2013Buying land for a house, please advise!46
05.02.2014Costs/planning land, additional construction costs, turnkey, etc.27
22.08.2013Plot - Decision?14
28.08.2013Separate land and generate building land? Where to inquire?14
14.11.2013Our floor plan of 120 sqm on a 469 sqm plot73
29.10.2013Property reserved, construction financing plan, architect/building permit application21
03.01.2014How much land and house can we afford?25
19.12.2018Alarm system with 2 cats - Technical upgrade experiences?39

Oben