Surveillance cameras: For / Against

The legal text alone often brings little. It becomes more interesting or purposeful to look at the relevant comments from lawyers or even case law on this discussed case "recording exclusively a non-public area (own property) and streaming it live unencrypted on the Internet."

Unencrypted streaming on the Internet does not mean that I post the URL on my social media channel so that others become aware of it. I can create a cryptic and extremely long URL for my camera so that no one stumbles upon it by accident. because you said it would then be pointless.

Although there are websites that list open IP cams (search on DuckDuckGo for "open ip cams")... it is of course possible that even one's own – despite a cryptic and long URL – might eventually be found by some giant.

What is this nonsense? Streaming publicly, but somewhere no one can find it? WHY? Oh, the pain while reading...

Streaming unencrypted on the internet does not mean that I post the URL on my social media channel so that others become aware of it. I can create a cryptic and extremely long URL for my camera so that no one stumbles upon it by accident. @Mycraft because you said it would be pointless then.

The URL length is irrelevant and it also doesn't matter what language it is in or whether it consists of cryptic or special characters.

Security through Obscurity as a security principle is rather condescendingly laughed at than taken seriously.

I don’t understand the point of all this, confusion tactic?

From page 7 onwards, it was mentioned by the TE for the first time as "unverschlüsselt" and if the stream is encrypted accordingly, it is no longer public!?

That of course depends.