Surveillance cameras: For / Against

Exactly - nothing! Or are you afraid that your own dog or your child could sue you?

The postman, for example

I have already considered whether a 500W LED floodlight would be more effective as a deterrent instead of cameras.

It is as always. The combination makes the difference. Then the camera can also recognize much more because there is more light available.

The feeling is not pleasant. To know that strangers have rummaged through your most personal belongings. Where even close people don’t even take a glance. At least that has affected one of my friends a lot.

Collection baskets and buckets are sometimes used as a code. Nobody home during the day, dog, single woman, etc. It was once in the newspaper. Since the move, we haven’t had any. In the old street, we and our neighbors put them by the fire station. After all, we’re polite.

The postman, for example.

A notice sign about surveillance is sufficient in this case. He does not have to enter the property even if a mailbox is attached at the front boundary and a doorbell is present.

A notice sign about surveillance is sufficient in this case. He does not have to enter the property even if the mailbox is attached at the front boundary and there is a doorbell.

We recently discussed this topic with our data protection officer for a company site with visitor traffic.
If I remember correctly, according to our data protection officer, a sign is not even mandatory. The protection of property is sufficient as a reason for recording. However, the recordings may only be accessible to a selected group of people.
Public areas must of course not be monitored.

If you apply this to a house, we are back to the point where recording is allowed, but it must not be posted unprotected on the internet.

but it must not be posted unprotected on the Internet.

This should be avoided in any case anyway. This is simply grossly negligent.