777.willo 2016-12-19 16:17:33#1After all, they define the top 120,000 as high earners and not the top 50% as is more often read here in the forum.
After all, they define the top 120,000 as high earners and not the top 50% as is more often read here in the forum.
SSteffen80 2016-12-19 16:41:03#2After all, they define the top 120,000 as high earners and not the top 50% as is often read here in the forum. I don’t understand that?
After all, they define the top 120,000 as high earners and not the top 50% as is often read here in the forum. I don’t understand that?
777.willo 2016-12-19 16:44:48#3Here in the forum, someone with 4000 net is quickly considered a top earner and the average income is used as evidence. At Focus, you are only considered one if you belong to the top 120000.
Here in the forum, someone with 4000 net is quickly considered a top earner and the average income is used as evidence. At Focus, you are only considered one if you belong to the top 120000.
AAbzahler 2016-12-19 16:57:11#5With a net income of 4000, one therefore has more income than 95% of all employees in comparison.
SSunny 2016-12-20 01:12:46#6"You are in the salary class of the 120,000 top earners." Too bad.. not the top 10,000 Hello we have the following problem and can't come to a "reasonable" solution My annual gross income from self-employment is about 120,000 EUR, Regards, Steffen In the ranking of workers, pensioners, and retirees you are in place 729,779. I think that fits better! This is not an attack, these are just facts.
"You are in the salary class of the 120,000 top earners." Too bad.. not the top 10,000 Hello we have the following problem and can't come to a "reasonable" solution My annual gross income from self-employment is about 120,000 EUR, Regards, Steffen In the ranking of workers, pensioners, and retirees you are in place 729,779. I think that fits better! This is not an attack, these are just facts.