Kallax - as already mentioned - has a lot of air and nothing solid in the "walls." The inner area, that is the compartments, are chipboard panels. This is not comparable to Metod. But if it is supposed to look somewhat valuable in the entrance area, unfortunately Kallax is just "trash." This is also reflected in the price comparison between Kallax and Metod.
I happened to actually see a 4-unit Kallax standing at the gym today, and it didn’t wobble. Regarding material, IKEA is known for minimal material use; they don’t use a gram more than necessary. I have installed Metod kitchens several times, and compared to some competitors, IKEA still seems more like entry-level quality. Nevertheless, we have moved three times with a Metod kitchen and I would consider an IKEA kitchen again anytime. Therefore, it doesn’t matter to me whether there is "air" inside or whatever; what counts is stability, and that is definitely sufficiently present. I find the term "trash" unnecessarily disparaging, since one could see the opposite everywhere on the internet and every Kallax buyer would be considered a fool and the Metod buyer automatically smart. There are plenty of kitchen buyers who call IKEA Metod "trash," so this can only be viewed with nuance. I wouldn’t want the solutions in the pictures in my house anyway, regardless of the price; in my opinion, that never looks stylish and will end up on the quoted "trash" in the next 10 years, but that is just my own feeling. The price comparison does not serve as a parameter, otherwise Opel compared to Porsche would also always be "trash." I think there are many shades of gray between black and white on this topic as well.