I mainly meant: if different filling methods (stages or entire floors) are supposed to make equally good sense, the two compared systems must differ in how well concrete poured from above, after it has slipped downwards, redistributes itself laterally within each layer of stones: that is, the difference in the construction-related lateral permeability of the webs must differ just as much as the filling methods.
By filling height per stage I meant: three layers would be 75 cm high. They could not simply be filled to the brim, otherwise the next three-layer stage would rest bluntly on top. So it is recommended to fill only 65 cm high to have 10 cm of interlocking with the next stage, or up to the top edge of the intermediate webs of the last layer, or up to the bottom edge of the transverse holes of the last layer, ... ? – the respective system inventor must make a statement on this (and probably also document it in the processing instructions for type testing). These would be differences that can hardly be left to the taste of the amateur cook.