Jean-Marc
2019-03-16 13:46:51
- #1
That is exactly the error in the assumption! Where do you get the certainty that the woman in the relationship can become pregnant immediately after stopping the pill? Where do you get the certainty that the child will be born healthy? Where do you get the certainty that the child will develop according to the usual average? Such questions could be spun on endlessly.
I would like to clarify this properly because that is not what I mean by "planning security." I understand it as the foundation on which one can start a family with the necessary confidence. In plain terms: completed education, both with permanent contracts, a sufficient income, and last but not least, the firm inner conviction of being ready for such a task. For some, this is already the case in their early twenties, for us only in our early/mid-thirties, and for others even later. Everything else, like quick pregnancy, health status, and the child's development, can indeed hardly be influenced; you have to take it as it comes.
The life paths of my wife and me have been rather unstable (studies, long-distance relationship, job changes, fixed-term contracts, an employer’s insolvency, knee surgery, etc.); in short, we have only recently been in a position to have a clear head for topics like children or building a house. I am firmly convinced that today, with the often high professional demands, one should not have too many open projects at the same time in life if one wants to maintain physical and mental health. And therefore the decision: first house building, then family planning.
We also know the local discussion all too well from relatives and friends, and it is pretty much always the same: Those who were taken on immediately after their training and were quickly equipped with plum jobs in their large companies naturally start at the latest by the end of their twenties and cannot understand how someone can still be trying to stabilize their life at 31 or 32. But that just exists.