Thank you for the comment - without jumps forward and backward we would prefer it - costs certainly play a role but almost even more error susceptibility/robustness in execution. We have approached the current square meter number from above, originally about 200 to now about 165 without losing much function (in our eyes). This somewhat strange shape then resulted. We first had to become clear about what 8 m², 15 m², 25 m² etc. mean in many rooms and how we feel in such rooms. The planner is a freelance planning office - not an architect. I think our project is actually not that complicated - our demands for form and style/aesthetics are also not particularly high. We have a room concept and certain material wishes ([Kalksandstein], [Erdwärme], [Klinker]) and of course the specifications of the [B-Plan] ([Grundflächenzahl], single-story and adaptation to the surroundings). The plot has no slope, is oriented north-south and rectangular - the only special feature is possibly the access from the west. It has already been noted that an access from the west would be ideal, but so far we have not found a solution here that did not end in a row house or very long corridors - but as I said, maybe the planner has an idea.