Opportunities for municipal land, experiences?

  • Erstellt am 2024-08-06 18:23:32

nordanney

2024-08-20 10:41:02
  • #1
That is a problem in rural areas. At that age, without renovation, you have terrible energy efficiency and thus have caused an immense loss in value over recent years. Such a shack is a slow seller everywhere, unless located in a metropolitan area. Regardless of whether it is leasehold or full ownership. Based on the condition. This is initially independent of the age. My current property is from the 60s and is valued like a new building (because renovated). Another confirmation of the condition of the property. Banks finance so that the loan repayment must be completed 10 years before the leasehold expires. So still all within limits. Conclusion: "junk property," but the leasehold is to blame for the poor sale. P.S. Most leasehold contracts include direct extension options for the leaseholder. There is also the contractually stipulated compensation at expiration if it is not extended. So you do not simply lose your house but receive the equivalent value in euros. Therefore, most leaseholds are not extended after the term, as there is usually no money to take over the property, or it simply does not fit the business model of the leasehold issuer.
 

ypg

2024-08-20 12:01:46
  • #2
But this is not a leasehold problem, rather that an unrenovated property always suffers value deductions. As an owner, you simply cannot ignore that the value consists of the property plus the land, and with leasehold, rent has to be paid. If you do not maintain a house, it naturally loses value.
 

Schorsch_baut

2024-08-20 13:48:40
  • #3
So, as far as I know from my colleague's complaints, the house was not a wreck. Heating completely new a few years ago with underfloor heating. Bathrooms new, exterior insulated and triple-glazed windows. He had imagined that he would sell the house quickly at a good price because of that. But in terms of layout and decor, everything very traditional.
 

Fuchsbau35

2024-08-20 13:49:55
  • #4


I read somewhere that in the case of compensation only 2/3 of the house value have to be paid. That is not really reassuring.
 

nordanney

2024-08-20 14:00:13
  • #5
No. According to the ErbbauRG it is 100% - although, of course, other arrangements can be made contractually. There is an exception if the hereditary building right was established for "low-income" people, then the minimum (!) amount is 2/3 - this serves to protect the entitled persons (contrary agreements in the hereditary building rights contract are then void). This would basically be social housing under hereditary building rights. Maybe your 2/3 come from this minimum amount.
 

nordanney

2024-08-20 14:05:33
  • #6

You probably only know his complaints, but not the true story. Maybe your colleague’s "almost giving it away" is a good price because his price expectations were somewhere beyond good and evil? Concrete figures would be nice.

If I sell my iPhone 12 for €270, I might also say that I "almost had to give it away," because I actually expected €500 on a former purchase price of €1,000. It's all relative.

But a decent house in a decent location still gets a decent price today – even as a leasehold property.
 

Similar topics
23.12.2020Heritable lease property the only solution?53
30.10.2016Construction delay -> Compensation?30
18.09.2017Upcoming house purchase: buy with or without leasehold rights?60
25.04.2018Heritable lease and bridge financing11
15.05.2020General Questions (Heritable Building Rights)43
20.10.2020Heritable lease with equity capital - claim by the heritable lessee20
09.03.2021Consideration: Heritable Building Right vs. Property Purchase / Renovation81
03.03.2021Single-family house + land (purchase or leasehold) with high interest rates26
06.09.2021Ground lease building plot experiences?40

Oben