Land planning - which house type/size is most sensible?

  • Erstellt am 2019-01-08 12:30:06

face26

2019-01-08 16:25:19
  • #1
Yes, that's correct. The architect first makes a cost estimate. Architect or general contractor, you can see it either way. A general contractor is not just any general contractor, and an architect is not just any architect. With a general contractor, you should be able to work with the construction method they are familiar with... breaking out of their known system is usually not advisable or sometimes associated with significant additional costs... with an architect, you are more flexible. But making a pro-con list here would, I think, be off-topic and too extensive. Stay with it, as a basis I would think of a rectangle. Approximately in a 3:2 ratio and carport to the northeast. Two full floors or at least knee wall in the direction of 2m or above.
 

Yaso2.0

2019-01-08 17:34:55
  • #2


My favorite is also a rectangle with at least knee walls from 2m.

How can I, as a layperson, recognize where the building boundary is or whether boundary construction adjoining the neighbor is allowed?

One general contractor, for example, recommended that we consider this house. A city villa.

 

face26

2019-01-08 17:46:28
  • #3
That would be a square

I hope not in orientation then.

Building boundary...the dashed line in the development plan.
Boundary construction for the carport. It varies regionally...state building regulations, local building ordinance, textual determination or justification....but you are not building anyway
 

Yaso2.0

2019-01-08 17:53:01
  • #4


Square, husband's ideal vision.
External dimensions 10.115 x 10.115. that was also the house he liked in the catalog.

However, floor plan somewhat different.

How would you orient this house? So I can get an idea of it
 

ypg

2019-01-08 18:02:46
  • #5
If you want to join the floor plan discussion, it would be sensible to fill out the questionnaire. For me, the floor plan is awful, for you and your requirements it might fit and be considered good. Just as a hint. By the way, one can ask oneself why a 17-meter-deep plot is being built on with a 10-meter-large house. I would keep the hedge in the north.
 

haydee

2019-01-08 18:08:49
  • #6
Just request catalogs from the major home manufacturers and browse their websites.
 

Similar topics
19.07.2018Draw the plan yourself? Do you necessarily need an architect?11
18.02.2011Architect totally messed up - experiences?17
03.03.2014Build a carport. Instead of wooden posts, is flat iron possible?12
14.12.2016Boundary construction double garage/carport 6x9m Lower Saxony29
10.04.2015Cost estimate architect single-family house. Your assessment44
17.05.2016Boundary construction garage and shed max. 9 meters - no more possible?20
17.05.2016Combine carport with terrace roof directly - legally13
26.04.2017Garage extended or additional carport10
27.04.2017Carport deviation from the building application21
09.12.2017Renovation with architect: Suggestions for house floor plan desired21
20.11.2018development plan, building line, building boundary, building window14
25.11.2019New single-family house approx. 174 m² floor plan architect55
04.05.2020Duties of a carport manufacturer23
24.10.2020Architect has not delivered - who will bear the costs?68
16.10.2020Driveway planning for large sloped property - 25% gradient43
07.02.2021Single-family house, two floor plan variants from the architect39
15.06.2022Carport roof and too long boundary construction30
21.07.2023Height reference point boundary construction Brandenburg10
22.01.2024Bypass building boundary through land extension instead of division30
29.07.2024Is my planned carport still exempt from approval?21

Oben