L-shaped bungalow with 120 sqm - layout etc.?

Furnish the floor plan to scale
Building services do not work for pantry, storage, building services, and laundry

Would plan with an internal staircase and also use the attic

Thank you very much.

I also suspect that the pitched roof and at least a 30-degree roof pitch might still provide some reserve.

Storage room is not a luxury either
You don’t have any space for suitcases, decorations, etc

regarding the current (own) draft (picture 1).
This is based on the Town & Country Perfect 111 bungalows (see picture 2)
Due to the specified angle and the roof shape, a loft would probably result – unfortunately, I still can’t assess what one should do with it.

In view of the redesign of the original floor plan, I would use another model for inspiration. By loft do you mean an attic? or a gallery?

There is an example floor plan from Ytong (117 K) .. which I am posting here rotated according to your plot.

That would at least be an example of a more suitable base model.

The gable position of the main gable is unfortunately predetermined (long side, see building plan, picture 3)

Do you mean the ridge? – do you interpret the arrows on the plot boundaries 2880/2881 and 2904/2905 as such a requirement?
Does the entire plot area count for the floor area ratio, or is the planting obligation zone not included?

This is based on the Town & Country Perfect 111 bungalows (see image 2)

Danwood would be settled... are you just using the idea and want to build with another general contractor or contractor, or do you want to build the house with Danwood, just with minor changes?

Due to the specified angle and the roof shape, a stage would probably result

It would result in a large roof, since the house width of almost 13/14 meters determines the roof size.

Technical room and pantry in one - accessible from both sides

From the kitchen, the door might open inward or possibly be a sliding door.

The point is that a room with 2 doors loses usable space.
By swapping the areas of the technical room and the toilet, you create an offset in the entrance (line of sight from front door to living room access) and an additional hallway between the corridor and kitchen. Since the latter already exists, a second door is absolutely unnecessary.

But: the design is already wrong by placing the door sideways when you have to walk past a garage. You will hardly get any piece of furniture into your house, let alone carry in a ladder. This corridor will be drafty as hell, everything else but nice is this front door situation.
Clarify whether the garage may also be built outside the building window. Otherwise: front door on the front.
The technical room should also have a short access path inside the house, so place it on the front as well.
These are basically fundamentals, which are planned incorrectly here.

The plot is not intended for a bungalow: roof pitch and ridge height, those are already two statements.
Although that won't affect your bungalow, the house in this development area with this building plan is simply a cost and space eater.
The roof (the roof surfaces) will be uneconomically large, the nearly 2/3 fully usable attic without sloping ceilings is just there and should not be used. Ecologically, it should be banned (my opinion).
You have a gross house body that is bigger than a normal gable roof house...

I can't imagine you have money to throw away, so think about why you want to build a bungalow. It is not automatically barrier-free anyway. Overall, you get an added value in the house if you move hobby/guest, storage room, and child with bathroom upstairs.

And the feeling: even 2 residential units are allowed. With 10 meters ridge height, the neighbors will get some real beasts if they exploit what they are allowed.

Edit: I mixed up the house width: it is only about 12 meters house width in the DW Perfect.

In view of the redesign of the original floor plan, I would use a different model for inspiration. By the stage, do you mean an attic? Or a gallery? That would already be an example of a more suitable basic model. Do you mean the ridge? - Do you interpret the arrows on the property boundaries 2880/2881 or 2904/2905 as such a regulation? Does the entire plot area apply for the floor area ratio, or is the planting obligation zone not included?

Thank you. We have now used a different floor plan. Furthermore, we do not want a basement, so an attic of the main roof with the gable roof and 30 degrees would probably be a good stage. I have not read anything yet about the floor area ratio and planting obligation zone not being included. I assume a floor area ratio of 540*0.4=216.

Thank you very much first of all for the detailed answer!

Danwood would be settled... are you just taking the idea and want to build with another BU/GU or do you want to build the house with Danwood, only with small changes?

We just want to use it as a basis. Actually, we want to build with a local general contractor and brick by brick.

The plot is not intended for a bungalow: roof pitch and ridge height, those are already two indications.
Although that does not touch your bungalow, the house in this building area with this development plan is purely a cost and space eater.
The roof (the roof surfaces) will be uneconomically large, the almost 2/3 fully usable attic without sloping ceilings is simply there and is not to be used. Ecologically, it should be forbidden (my opinion).
You have a gross building volume that is larger than a normal gable roof house...

I can’t imagine you have money to waste, so think about why you want to build a bungalow. It is not automatically barrier-free anyway. Overall, you get added value in the house if you move hobby/guest, storage room and child with bathroom upstairs.

We talked a lot. The fact is that all parents of ours live in huge single-family homes, where the attic is no longer used and is empty. Furthermore, we want to sleep on the ground floor, not have rooms twice, have low maintenance, and not have the bedrooms upstairs with small children and the master bedroom on the ground floor. We don’t want all of that, so it always came back to the bungalow.

The roof (probably then a pitched roof) will then be a stage and storage space since we want to do without a basement.
I think this would also not be significantly better ecologically.

The main roof would probably be about 14.5m*9m.

It’s about a room losing space with two doors.
By swapping the technical room and bathroom, you get an offset in the entrance (line of sight front door/living room access) and an additional hallway between corridor and kitchen. Since the latter is already present, a second door is absolutely superfluous.

But: the design is already wrong by placing the door on the side if you have to walk past a garage. You’ll hardly get any furniture into your house, let alone carry in a ladder. This passage will be terribly drafty, everything else but nice, but not this front door situation.
Check whether the garage can be built outside the building window. Otherwise: front door to the front.
The technical room also belongs on a short route into the house, so place it to the front, too.
These would be fundamentals that are wrongly planned here.

In the new design, the utility/technical room is different and separated from the pantry. Technical makes sense in the new design in my opinion, as it is close to the access point and next to the bathroom (= laundry etc.).

Garage is a critical point – unfortunately, I don’t expect that to fit either. Therefore, a design with a carport and covered entrance area.

Attached is the revised design based on the DW Perfect 131.

Tomorrow we are going to the planner, I hope we are not completely wrong.