hampshire
2021-11-19 13:11:31
- #1
I agree. Therefore, here are 2 alternatives to the "exact" comparison, both of which prove effective: My parents-in-law were supporters of the British equivalent of Stiftung Warentest and followed their ratings. They did well with that and had few decision problems. If a device later turned out not to be so great, they had the supposed certainty that all the others would have been even worse. Self-deception that works. I am super curious and read into everything that comes into my hands and learn how things work, who invented them and for what motivation, how seemingly identical functions are implemented differently, what the producing companies stand for, what business models they have... hardly anyone has time for that, I prefer to do that instead of, for example, watching TV, and that way the time is "saved." In the end, I decide based on gut feeling anyway, because throughout all the wild research, providers emerge who I find more likeable than others. Rarely is there a wrong purchase involved, and I would only admit that reluctantly - even to myself. ;) Self-deception that works. But anyone who tries to check everything completely objectively and "safely" always lives with doubt about their decision. Even if this decision objectively "should have been the best," the doubt gnaws on. It’s stupid to live like that, isn’t it?But I still think it is extremely tedious to compare exactly.