Hager technical control center or server cabinet?

  • Erstellt am 2020-08-12 04:19:55

K1300S

2021-08-17 15:53:02
  • #1
It depends on how many devices you want to connect. ;) Although I wouldn't necessarily equate the number of network outlets with the number of switch ports.
 

RotorMotor

2021-08-17 16:15:33
  • #2
Do the Unifi APs also have the IGMPv3 problem or only the switches? And is there still no solution for it?

Does the combination of Cisco switch and Unifi APs work well regarding VLAN management and such?
 

Tarnari

2021-08-17 16:43:41
  • #3


We just have two 24-port patch panels that are almost fully occupied. I didn’t feel like having to worry about PoE when unplugging something. In other words, if I plug something PoE-capable in anywhere in the house, it should just work directly without me having to unplug anything else.
On top of that (and this was the biggest challenge) was finding such a switch that doesn’t mess up with Magenta TV.
After a lot of research, the Cisco was chosen because of these factors and other requirements.


The APs are not a problem. I have four running on the Cisco here and Magenta runs wonderfully.
The Unifi switches are the problem. There is also the Edge series from Ubiquiti, which can handle it too. I initially considered that as well, but there was just no experience available regarding it.
With the Unifi switches, there is a workaround, but it is quite complex and, if I remember correctly, has to be done again after every reboot.
The Cisco SB series is quite widespread and, for example, popular in the A d m i n I s t r a t o r forum.
Regarding VLANs, it can do all of that; among other reasons, that’s why Cisco was chosen. But honestly, everything is still running pretty “dumb” here because I simply haven’t had the time and inclination to tackle it yet.
 

Daniel-Sp

2021-08-17 17:16:24
  • #4
I am running a Cisco SG 300 as a Layer 3 switch with 3 Unify access points and Magenta TV and 5 VLANs. No problems. The dumb Fritzbox provides internet and the switch routes between the individual networks and the internet as desired. In this way, I have also blocked my IoT network from the internet, but can still access both the internet and the IoT network from the other subnets. I did some reading beforehand and invested one of my wife's night shifts to implement it this way.
 

K1300S

2021-08-17 17:21:11
  • #5
If you can live with the routing performance, that's okay. Otherwise, the SG300 is rather weak as a router.
 

Daniel-Sp

2021-08-17 17:37:12
  • #6
For a small home network, more than sufficient and extremely stable. But it also depends on the data throughput and routing throughput one has. Most home users will not even come close to utilizing the performance of the SG 300 or its successor.
 

Similar topics
10.12.2015Space requirement in HAR for central ventilation system41
09.01.2017Network Technology 2016 for a Single-Family House63
06.10.2017Which switch do we need?16
12.03.2018Planning of the network cabinet and its contents44
20.09.2023Bauhaus concrete villa with core insulation - experiences1658
25.02.2019New construction: Connection & cabling Internet + TV103
22.02.2019Home network cabling with POE access points38
29.02.2020Implement LAN and SAT in a single-family house with a central server cabinet40
19.02.2020WLAN Access Points - but which ones?59
08.01.2021Are LAN sockets still up-to-date? WLAN/wireless is the future!262
05.03.2020What should I consider when using Wi-Fi?27
04.11.2021The secure, upscale network in the single-family house59
13.09.2020Do you have experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?57
22.07.2020Which switch with POE and 16 or 24 ports20
12.08.2020Unifi AC Pro setup problems19
02.11.2020Unifi Dream Machine or USG + Cloud Key20
08.06.2021Unifi NanoHD on concrete ceiling - which box to provide?61
20.07.2023WiFi Access Point Outdoor - where/how to mount Unifi FlexHD?24
10.01.2023Which router for our new building?146
11.08.2022Which smart home system is suitable for our new building?230

Oben