MayrCh
2020-02-11 19:16:53
- #1
I am not arguing at all, I am just repeating.
Alright then, I find the argumentation you are repeating doubtful.
You, on the other hand, argue,
I argue just as little, but rather present contexts and facts.
with your crystal ball.
How else should I foresee future developments? You obviously have a more valid tool at hand.
current political will
If only politics knew what it wanted. Nuclear phase-out yes. No, not after all. Yes! A CO2 price is needed. A little. More! This haggling about the Renewable Energy Act going away and being replaced by CO2 pricing is nothing but a compromise between Red-Green and Black interests. One side wants a price for CO2, the other wants the Renewable Energy Act surcharge gone. That's the deal ("political will"). It was NEVER about lowering electricity prices; that could be managed much easier with corresponding tax cuts. Here it's about balancing interests, ideally packaged nicely for the electorate.
Amid all the speculation, the fact is that I can operate partially self-sufficiently with photovoltaics
You want to trigger me, don’t you? Self-sufficient is someone who has no grid connection. If even 1 kWh passes through your meter (in any direction), you are one thing for sure, namely not self-sufficient. Neither fully nor partially.