Floor Plan Discussion: Single-family house on 630 sqm plot

Are these actually the original plans from your architect or did you redraw them?

Square kitchens are difficult to furnish, rectangular rooms are better.

Are these actually the original plans from your architect or did you trace them?

These are the original plans from the architect. I only created a screenshot here. But I also found the measurements hard to read....

The pantry should be reached through a hidden access (visually so that one thinks there is a kitchen cabinet there)

That is unnecessarily expensive and in my opinion absolutely unnecessary in a closed kitchen. I would go into explicit planning there. And this shopping pass-through area is unnecessarily equipped with doors; you can't store anything proper in the passageway anyway. It just needs to be planned differently.

Bedroom rough measure 300 cm, the adjacent planned dressing room basically still too narrow, it will simply be tight. 180 cm mattresses usually also have a bed frame. There remain about 50 cm on the right and left. As soon as you have a leg problem and need to get to bed with crutches, it simply becomes impossible.

It's not that you can't read the measurements, but for example, the stairs are nowhere dimensioned. No step height / tread depth, no floor height indicated anywhere.

The loggia is supposed to be there because a whirlpool is supposed to go there? Have you tried that for a longer time? And have you checked common whirlpool dimensions, because here there are only 214 cm rough construction depth, which in my opinion could be tight.

You yourself agree on many points, be it wardrobe, this strange worm-like extension from the bedroom, bathroom etc. ... I think you have to start over again.

Number of parking spaces 2

Do they have to be reachable separately? Garage according to your words 1 car and the bikes?

Price estimate according to architect/planner: 3000 EUR per sqm

hmm ... I see that as tightly calculated, also considering the special features of the load-bearing upper floor outer wall above the middle of the garage. Is there going to be some self-performance there?

Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 700k

Also including land? What price does that have then?

Square kitchens are difficult to furnish; rectangular rooms are better.

It is a rectangular room; the problem is simply the airlock intended for storage and the architect's interior design planning. Although I would rather not plan the window that wide there and would choose the sill height more at countertop height with a normally high window and not such an elongated window slit. In general, one also has to ask again what the floor construction will be like, because the specified sill heights seem to be from the raw floor. If the floor construction has to be calculated as usual with 15-20 cm, some rooms would have a sill height that is too high for me.

So I don't think the draft is bad; you can work with it. The weaknesses have already been mentioned, but in my opinion, they can be easily fixed:

[*]The kitchen/pantry situation is nonsense and hardly usable at all. And of course, you want to get from the hallway to the kitchen and not have to do a marathon through the living room first. My solution would be something like this:

[ATTACH alt="küche-saerox.jpg"]85334[/ATTACH]

Upstairs, I would completely do without the walk-in closet and instead buy nice wardrobes. That immediately creates freedom and space to move.
The bathroom is a disaster, but redesigning it is no problem.
The reading nook is nonsense; no one wants to sit there. The small room is ideal for suitcases and clothes racks, if you ask me.

I am assuming a flat roof here and would therefore plan a flood of light into the hallway upstairs.

Personally, it would affect my quality of life to constantly circle around the staircase. The kitchen and living area are arranged almost in a circle around it. The chill area is basically a passageway or not really chill at all. Ideally, you enter the living areas via the dining area so that A you don’t have to go through the kitchen and B don’t have to go through the chill area. Here it is exactly the other way round, and that would bother me and unfortunately be a dealbreaker for the draft. Still, the thing isn’t totally bad, if you ask me.

By the way, I consider the space for furnishing the wardrobe sufficient as soon as you give up the completely unnecessary door to the garage. However, the layout isn’t very elegant if you actually want to place 60 cm deep wardrobes, which you need for 4 people.

I also see the statics as problematic regarding the partial overbuilding of the garage.