Oh, so you want to grab all packages or visitors at the front? I personally find that a bit odd, even if you are introverted.
I think there should be more than just the property boundary in front of an entrance. You only see the entrance in its entirety with the house, not possible at 2 meters distance. Somehow like pearls before swine..
I understand the point and in an ideal world there would be more space in front of the entrance, but with limited property size we have to choose between more garden (we would possibly also like space for a pool) or a more "representative" entrance, and we prefer to take the garden. We once considered the entrance on the gable side, but we really don't like that for the rest of the house layout. I also find it quite nice to be able to take out the trash practically in pajamas without being seen from the street. As I said, I can completely understand what might bother someone about the planned entrance layout, but I think the compromises involved with other variants would bother us more.
I quickly looked at the floor plan in detail. Without dimensions, however, you can only guess quite a bit. (I leave windows aside)
For the granny flat, I find the bathroom and the bedroom much too small.
The objection that there will still be cycling and noise above is important to me.
We will reconsider the bedroom, but I see the bathroom differently. We have had a bathroom with almost identical dimensions before and it was absolutely okay.
The WC in the main house is tiny, so you bump your head against the washbasin.
I don’t fully agree here either. In our current apartment, we have a WC that is even slightly smaller and find it absolutely unproblematic. Despite being 1.80 m tall, I have never bumped into anything there. Of course, bigger would be nicer, but the size does not seem that bad to me after all.
There should/must be at least 1 meter of space in front of a stove, otherwise the cushions will singe on you (from personal experience).
The chimney flue should be planned closer to the ridge than the eaves. It must (I think) be built higher than the ridge anyway.
Since the fireplace will be a gas fireplace, the chimney flue can be where it is and is also fine in terms of height. As far as I know, the legal requirement to be near the ridge only applies to stoves with solid fuels. The sofa currently has 87 cm distance to the fire (the part in front is just the mantlepiece), but the distance can surely still be increased a bit.
The dining area is tight; with fully occupied chairs, you can no longer get around the table. The table is quite small.
I have to check the table size; I think 180 cm (planned with the existing antique dining table). I'm not sure I see the need to get around the table to reach the front windows when all chairs are occupied. The exit towards the porch is, I think, not a problem, there is enough space. We might possibly still enlarge the room a bit.
Bathrooms on the upper floor are also very tight. The master bathroom shower needs a door.
I will add that tomorrow; many details are still missing. Where exactly are the bathrooms too tight otherwise? The passage widths seem fine to me everywhere. I already mentioned above that we are not the type for large spa bathrooms, so that is not a priority for us, but of course we do not want to create tiny rabbit hutches. Exactly where do you see problematic narrow spots?
Overall, I don’t find the parents’ area well-rounded.
Are all the cabinets drawn to fit? So no standard dimensions?
The cabinets are 60 cm deep and we planned using Ikea Pax dimensions. The program recognizes when you want to depict wall cabinets and places a cover strip in front of small gaps at the edge. That’s how we would do it in reality as well; the Pax series is great for custom-fitting wall cabinets.
Regarding the budget: even with EL, I see more a 4 than a 3 before the 000.
I cannot quite understand that in view of the offer we already have. The house from the offer has similar amounts of window space, more doors, and stylistically is, as mentioned, very comparable.