Floor plan, building with tree, granny flat, and existing buildings

  • Erstellt am 2023-02-21 20:48:29

hanghaus2023

2023-10-22 11:45:36
  • #1
Thank you for redrawing. I have 9 m*12.5 m for the house. The original was 10 m * 13.5 m The sketch shows that my statement is correct. The usable rooms are significantly larger. If I leave out the wall stub, as shown in post #70, then the bedroom is no longer so cramped, but if you want to separate it, a curtain will do in a pinch.
 

hanghaus2023

2023-10-22 11:53:09
  • #2
Unfortunately, the 4 minutes again? Sorry.

Here is the correction.

If I leave out the wall stub, as shown in post #84, then the bedroom is no longer so cramped, but if you value separation, a curtain will do in a pinch.

135m2 * 0.8 is about 108 m2 living space

112.5 m2 * 0.8 is about 90 m2 living space

18 m2 * 3 k = 54 k cost savings.
 

hanghaus2023

2023-10-22 12:07:03
  • #3
We had a case here some time ago where someone had to build a house around the oak tree. The plot was much smaller then. I don't see it quite as extreme here. With the reduction to 9*12.5 m as I have marked, you are further away from the beech with the new building than with the existing house. The alternative, in my opinion, is rather a narrow house with an extension or bay window.
 

ypg

2023-10-22 14:49:41
  • #4
That is often the reason why everything is lined up. … and depends on the size of the hallways. Why? The crown starts higher up and can provide a lot of shade on the terrace for a loner. Of course, you could also not just chop off the upper floor at the gable end, but cut out a pie slice and glass the gable, to have the beech tree inside the house :) It doesn’t have to be the expensive full-area glazing, but a floor-to-ceiling window without a railing, i.e. a rotated window band, to always be able to see the tree in all its glory, would be affordable.
 

ypg

2023-10-22 15:42:44
  • #5
What would of course be the most obvious solution, to reduce the attic, is the knee wall. That’s how it has always been done, instead of creating an expensive flat roof: without a knee wall or building it small and installing knee walls inside or using the walls for built-in wardrobes. The builder with the oak tree right in the middle of his property is, as far as I remember, User . In the end, he built a triangular shape, with a great view of his oak.
 

K a t j a

2023-10-22 16:22:38
  • #6
I immediately thought of Oakland as well, but in my opinion the options here are still a bit cheaper.
Another suggestion in favor of the beech:








 

Similar topics
17.04.2016Value of land and bungalow B5511
01.08.2013Is the property right for us?15
09.04.2014Questions/neglected plot/meadow, determining construction measures44
24.07.2014Buy public parking lot next to the property17
16.06.2015Take the property or wait and accept the risk?22
05.10.2016House placement on the property, ideas sought23
27.01.2015Who has to support the property?22
21.02.2015Problem with shadow on the property...Assessment12
14.03.2015What would you build on this property?16
24.04.2015Non-buildable plot according to Paragraph 34?13
27.05.2015Front door made of natural oak?11
17.08.2015Expand property11
28.08.2015Alignment of rooms in a northeast plot22
23.10.2015Land reservation17
08.01.2016House placement on a small 448m² plot56
05.01.2016Building on the parents' property12
30.07.2016Neighbor is encroaching on the property32
07.09.2021Floor plan tube house L-shape triangular plot including oak tree529
14.10.2019Looking for a solid table approximately 240 cm oak30
24.01.2021Additional costs for oak stair covering instead of beech – usury?16

Oben