Thanks for the note regarding the questionnaire:
Development plan/Restrictions
Plot size - 650 sqm
Slope – slight south-facing slope
Site coverage ratio – 0.4
Floor area ratio – 1.0
Building window, building line and boundary – see attachment
Edge development
Number of parking spaces - 4
Number of floors – max. 2 full floors
Roof shape – gable roof 38
Style – modern / Bauhaus / puristic(?)
Maximum heights/limits – wall height max. 8m
Client requirements
Style, roof shape, building type – single-family house as a semi-detached building + small granny flat (possibly studio)
Basement, floors – basement only for technical equipment, laundry room, small storage
Number of persons, age – couple 38/39, 1 child (10)
Room requirements on ground floor, upper floor – 1 bathroom (shower only) per floor, 1 children's room
Office: family use or home office? – no home office, no office necessary
Overnight guests per year – 0
Open or closed architecture – as open as possible
Conservative or modern construction – the more modern, the better
Open kitchen, kitchen island – island
Number of dining seats – 6
Fireplace – gas fireplace as minimal room divider
Music/stereo wall – no
Balcony, roof terrace – none
Garage, carport – garage with 1 parking space + area for bicycles, small workbench
Utility garden, greenhouse – no
Further wishes/special features/daily routine, gladly also reasons why this or that should or shouldn’t be – laundry room in basement, drying room upstairs (it is like that – don’t ask)
House design
Who created the design:
- architect
What do you particularly like? Why?
What do you not like? Why? – The house seemed quite nice to us, but somehow disharmonious as a semi-detached house
Price estimate according to architect/designer: 545k EUR
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings: 450k EUR
Preferred heating technology: gas
If you have to give up, on which details/extensions
- you can give up:
- you cannot give up:
Why did the design turn out the way it is now? e.g.
Standard design from the planner?
Which corresponding/wished features were implemented by the architect?
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes?