Construction loan - Ex-partner does not pay his share

  • Erstellt am 2020-08-03 12:07:26

pagoni2020

2020-08-05 11:23:57
  • #1
Hm.....now we actually all forgot how simple life is for divorced people, their children, and new partners!
 

Grillhendl

2020-08-05 11:37:26
  • #2


Please???

WHAT IS THIS NOW?

In my initial post, I only asked quite matter-of-factly what options there might be. Maybe someone here has had similar experiences...

Yes, the father could also spend the money on himself... Everyone can spend their money on themselves... BUT THAT WAS NOT THE QUESTION HERE!!!!
 

pagoni2020

2020-08-05 12:08:49
  • #3
Don’t get too upset . No one knows what is right and above all, there is no "right". In such a situation, everyone suffers damage, some more financially and others emotionally, etc. No one has ever experienced exactly the same thing and the actors and involved persons are different and feel differently. What I wrote to you does not come from the belief that I am smarter than anyone else, but from what I myself or people close to me have experienced and what has developed over time and with increasing distance for those involved. There is the technical way: money, lawyer, enforcement measures, and this can be financially successful. There is the other way, for example as described by , which may not financially achieve what one personally considers fair, but which can be more bearable for both sides in the long run. But nobody really knows, and the children are different and feel and perceive this burden in different ways. In my opinion, that is the greatest danger, which I would not want to take!!! It is clear that such conflicts never end as long as these bonds exist. A sale would also end this "bond," but one wants to avoid that at all costs and thus (perhaps subconsciously) keeps the bond alive. As soon as one problem is somehow solved legally, the next one is dug up. Apparently, it is not an existing problem but one deliberately created to compensate for an injury, so one problem simply follows the next and then you go back to the lawyer... And , since your partner pays maintenance to the ex-wife instead of the children, which is not appropriate for adult children AND he has already reduced child support, he will rightly have to face accusations. No side is free of mistakes here; each side should make that clear to themselves; then it could become easier. Unfortunately, one often only realizes that years later... really a pity about the time!
 

HilfeHilfe

2020-08-05 12:51:29
  • #4


no, you’re picking on the ex and the biological children.

Maybe your husband is lying?

And why should the children necessarily be involved in this!!
 

Grillhendl

2020-08-05 13:07:07
  • #5


maybe

maybe

maybe

maybe

that you’re not contributing anything here right now, you notice that yourself, don’t you?
 

Tolentino

2020-08-05 13:10:11
  • #6


That does not have to be the case. A wife is also entitled to maintenance if her standard of living changes significantly due to the divorce.
This could already be the case here, since the ex-husband owns several properties.
Ultimately, it remains speculation, but I would not judge hastily.
And yes, reducing child support, if that is indeed the case, is not acceptable.
 

Similar topics
04.07.2015House contract with financing condition, lawyer wanted10
21.07.2020Lawyer wanted to sue the construction company52
11.04.2020Construction law - hire a lawyer or not yet16
24.01.2021Construction financing with child support?100
28.06.2024Building permit - is a lawyer useful?12

Oben