Tassimat
2020-08-03 15:21:18
- #1
But what is the alternative? As long as the ex has a fortune in the form of the half of the house, one should get access to the money in the long run, right?
And which bank is supposed to finance the ex? She seems to be illiquid.If it is a house, you cannot have 2 separate financings with separate land register entries.
It results in a title effective for 30 years... including possible wage garnishment etc. I doubt the ex wants to go down that path.So I don’t want to be a smartass now, but when I think about my variable financing, which was at a similar amount and divided into 2 parts, then 30k€ is just a payment of 90-120€. For me, it was 90€. To risk the bank pledging both residential units (I say this politely) would be "unreasonable." The same applies to a lawyer. What’s the point for you to be right and possibly win, if a) you don’t get the value of the dispute back and b) you’re stuck with the dispute/court costs. I would keep bothering the lady until she pays on her own. There are moral means and ways. You just have to get creative.
It results in a title effective for 30 years... Including possible garnishment of wages, etc. I doubt the ex wants to take this path.