I understood it that the divorce was about the future installment. Whether these alleged five-figure debts even exist in that sense (legally), I dare to doubt after the explanations. Maybe something can still be arranged within the framework of the equalization of accrued gains, but if not, everything paid during the marriage would probably be considered settled.Didn’t the OP even write that originally (but presumably before the divorce) it was agreed that the ex-wife would pay her share later? I mean, inheritance was mentioned. Then the partner might, if I understand Kati correctly, possibly not even be able to obtain an enforceable title now, right?
No. Dr. is an academic degree and Prof. sometimes as well or an official designation.
Royal Highness would be a title. Or baroness.
Even if I’m nitpicking late: Dr. is a title and a mandatory part of the name (like a nobility title). Anyone who earns a doctorate must have all their relevant documents (passport, ID card, driver’s license, etc.) updated, because a doctorate title must be used. This is not the case with Professor, nor with Magister, Dipl. ing., Dipl. anything else, Master, etc.: those are academic degrees. However, the grilled chicken doesn’t really help.
In a court, it is about law and not about justice. Justice, due to its subjectivity, is hardly negotiable. Bitter.No, rather at the end the realization and consternation that morality and law have nothing to do with each other.