Construction loan - Ex-partner does not pay his share

Declaration of division in the land register? That could still be a chance if there are 2 actually divided residential units. However, only if the bank does it in "goodwill".

Yes, there is the declaration of division in the land register. Property taxes are also billed separately...

His hope now is that the bank cooperates. The advisor already sounded confident and didn’t dismiss it right away. The residential unit is worth more than the still outstanding 30,000 euros....

It does not have to be that way. A wife also has a right to maintenance if her standard of living changes significantly as a result of the divorce. This could already be the case here since the ex-husband owns several properties. Ultimately, it remains speculation, but I would not judge prematurely. And yes, reducing child support, if that were the case, is not allowed.

This is purely about this construction loan. Maintenance and how and why it is all settled.

That does not have to be the case. A wife is also entitled to maintenance if her standard of living changes significantly due to the divorce.

But that is called "spousal maintenance" and is something separate.
Like here, adult children receive child support in full, without any deductions.

And yes, reducing child support, if that were the case, is not allowed.

...that was described like this, and it could quickly happen that the father receives the existing maintenance order in writing with enforcement.
Such mix-ups are deliberately and for good reason prohibited.
As far as I have read, the matrimonial maintenance claims are already notarized, they are currently just one-sidedly not being complied with.
But that has NOTHING to do with the maintenance for the children; reducing that to offset other claims is neither legal nor acceptable for the children.

This is purely about this construction loan. Maintenance and how and why are all clarified.

....that is why he is not allowed to reduce this for the children anyway!
Why doesn’t he pay his maintenance directly to the children? That seems a bit strange to me and does not appear to be a deliberately intended, clear separation of these matters.

The youngest child will only turn 18 in 2 months. Until then, the maintenance still goes to the mother. The other two are completely excluded in this regard, as they are employed themselves.

maybe

maybe

maybe

maybe

you realize yourself that you are not contributing anything here right now, don’t you?

no you are too one-sided for me!