However, some construction companies are now refusing in advance to provide a concrete, turnkey offer because we do not yet have the mentioned plot of land.
There are a total of nine semi-detached and 22 terraced house plots. Strangely, so far about 50 applications.
Well, 50:31 is still harmless – it is not uncommon for building plots in newly offered areas to be oversubscribed four, five, or even more times.
Every plot is special, i.e., the more concrete the offer, the more its validity is limited to the individual case. To name the current list price for a "Stadtvilla Cindy 152" to you as a financing dummy should be doable anytime off the cuff.
If you want to know more precisely, it also means more work – that a provider only makes an offer against a reasonable chance of realization, I find understandable. In this process, the provider has three risks: 1. You do not get financing; 2. Someone else gets "your" plot; 3. You have dozens of "irons in the fire". Only one of these risks – except, of course, the unavoidable one that you find a better provider – must be evaluated for the provider's effort not to be in vain (but not for free; qualified offers are really elaborate).
Just out of curiosity: how does it work with terraced and semi-detached houses when everyone chooses their own construction company?
We have this question repeatedly and regularly "on the table"; the result is always the same: I say that it requires a large dose of naivety or a cynically sadistic mindset to allocate plots for groups of houses of any kind to individual builders ("dispersed ownership" developers); several discussants share this view to a greater or lesser extent; and some others think that I am at least exaggerating or overstating; not infrequently, the latter is supported by the fact that there are success cases (which I do not deny, by the way, but with such high stakes I decidedly reject such roulette).