Agricultural land expected for commercial use - long narrow plot

But I am also thankful for any assessment.

We know nothing and therefore cannot make any assessment. Nothing about the LK, nothing about the rest of the area, nothing about what surrounds it, nothing about how the municipality works, and nothing about what its objectives are.

Glass spheres were out of stock again .. a 300x10m plot developed from the 10m side will probably not be subdivided. Because the development runs away from the 10 m width. In some questions, you really have to shake your head given the information provided.

The 300 x 10 is logically a completely exaggerated example of a narrow long plot, I thought that was clear... The question was merely whether a narrow long plot will be left in its shape after development or rearranged.

Question 1: Is there a apportionment procedure?
If not, then the very simple answer is: You are allowed to pay the development costs, but then you will end up with an unsellable property.
If yes, then question 2 follows: Will your property be included, provided you do not sell now?

As I read your initial post, you will end up with a property that is just as unsellable as it is now. For a measly 3,600 sqm, a) the municipality, unless there is huge pressure, will not make any special effort. And then there are many nice properties around your land that the municipality can divide exactly as an investor/buyer needs.

My actual question revolves around the shape of the plot.

The question was merely whether a narrow, long plot is left in its shape after redevelopment or is rearranged.

Redevelopment regularly takes place only after the rearrangement, but these are independent procedures. The purpose of the rearrangement is never to give each contributor a more nicely shaped plot than before. But as if by magic, it is always managed that the most stubborn troublemakers get the ugliest piece.

Question 1: Is there a rearrangement procedure?
If not, then the very simple answer is: you have to pay the redevelopment costs but then you are stuck with an unsellable plot. If yes, then question 2 follows: Will your plot be included provided you don’t sell now?

I practically know only one case constellation in which a plot is not included in the rearrangement mass at all: namely by leaving it out of the scope of the development plan. The justification for this can certainly be devised. One cannot dance to everyone's tune in spatial planning who wants their share of the profits from crop rotation to be bigger.

The intention behind the question is unclear to me. If the property is sold, the likelihood of a redivision is 99%. But that is then irrelevant for the OP. If he does not sell, then his land will be excluded from development and marketing. Depending on the location, it is then worth less than before.