Building ground suddenly a biotope

Key issues are likely here

since we moved the house and therefore are not building according to the development plan

and here

And that is the south side.

And there are also some inconsistencies in your posts. The facts are hard to discern and are portrayed very one-sidedly.

We submitted the plan for building

Does that mean you submitted a building application, a preliminary building inquiry, or what exactly was submitted? Show the location of the building mass as applied for.

it was then rejected

Without knowing the exact wording, nothing can be said about it.

In 2010, the biotope was then expanded to about 60 percent of the property (the upper part)

How do you know that?
Who expanded it?
Where is it documented?
Is there a change to the development plan?

The red line is the biotope line.

Where did you get that from?

without a specialist lawyer you won’t make progress

I think whatever was applied for was insufficiently justified. A lawyer will not help in this case.

4. Got the old prices from the developer

Didn’t we establish that it is not a developer? Who is the builder-licensed plan author? An architect from the construction company?

What I hoped for was that someone knows a loophole.

The loophole is to build according to the development plan.

In this building window we would still have to intervene in the biotope.

Which, well justified, should not be a problem.

We have also already directed this inquiry to the district office

What was requested in what form? Has replanning already taken place?

So that might be bad advice now

Yes.

So we would have to buy a new plot.

Or commission a reasonable planner.

Victim of biotope and slope

I am not inclined to believe that yet.

how a house is supposed to be placed there now

As long as he does not answer your question about the exact location of the biotope in relation to the building window, I do not see the authorities as responsible. I claim there is no conflict between the building window and the biotope. The OP wants an exemption that cannot be granted.

We have submitted a building application. The house is at roughly the same level as in the B plan but shifted to the left. Then, after the rejection, we moved down; the house is now outside the biotope. Only the excavations are within the biotope. Inquiries and everything were made by the contracted company as well as the email correspondence with the district office and with us (we write to the construction company what they should write to the district office since they advise us). The information was found out by the construction company. We also asked the district office in writing what is to be protected; in response, we were told that the meadow and excavations are to be avoided. With the second submitted plan, the reply was that we could build like that. We then had to ask again what is now allowed regarding the excavations or not; in response, the district office asked why we have to excavate as the house is no longer in the biotope. Then it was because of the construction pit, and since then radio silence.

Basically, we will call there again on Monday to ask about the pit, and if not, then fortunately we have planned enough reserve sheet piles.

Answer all questions from Escorda and submit the requested documents. If anyone can help you here, then Escorda.

Ok, I’ll do it, but I’m at work until 6 pm, then I’ll read it through more carefully and respond.
Thank you.

The second submitted plan came back, we can build like that.

So it is approved after all. Very nice

Excavations are to be avoided

What exactly does it say? Can you take a photo of that part?

PS: You should really put a bit more effort into writing the texts. Yes, it’s hard with the phone, but it is very illegible and confusing.