And where this axis is, is determined by the district office based on the placement of the house on the property (discretionary power).
No, that is determined by the development plan.
[ATTACH alt="Traufhöhen.png" type="full"]39728[/ATTACH]
I couldn’t make much use of it.
I feel the same way about some of your statements, for example:
We then had to ask again what is allowed regarding the excavations or not, whereupon the district office asked why we need to excavate, the house is no longer in the biotope. Then it was about the construction pit and since then radio silence.
We just wanted to know in this forum whether the biotope is lawful and yes, it is.
I must have overlooked that. Who wrote that and where?
Anyone who reads through this, please, please check yourself whether something is on a property before buying it and don’t rely on someone telling you, not even a city.
Your problem is not the biotope but that you and your planner want to build in a way that intentionally does not comply with the development plan.
We then agreed with the building authority that we would forgo dark roof tiles and in return get a 2 m garden fence. We gave up a bay window and got a 2 m knee wall instead.
The motto here: Just ask for everything possible and then negotiate compromises. I have to say: Well negotiated. I tip my hat to what you managed to get through despite the development plan. I find it a bit presumptuous to complain about the four weeks, although I still don’t understand exactly what needs to be decided now, if there is already a building permit.
No, we are not allowed, the house must have its longer side parallel to the street.
Where does it say that? For your property, a main ridge direction is not even established.
But the boss said it’s not our fault.
That is correct. The planner must fully clarify the building regulations before drawing up the first draft. At least fair, not to shift the blame onto the client.
These are now the current plans where nothing is left in the biotope.
Surprising that you only provide them in #84, they should have been included after #1, as well as the site plan. Even at #118 there isn’t one yet.
Please try again to formulate a question as precisely as possible where you hope for help from the forum. And then put yourself in the position of a forum user, what information they would need from you to answer the question.