11ant
2020-09-15 16:13:21
- #1
That by no means means to me that I shouldn’t strive for a 100% solution.
Oh yes, Pareto does not mean a plea to declare 80% as the new benchmark – but merely an awareness that the mountain beyond the Pareto optimal point becomes many times steeper; and – and that is what I wanted to make clear: if you pause at the 80% point with this insight in mind, you still have the energy to reach the 80% point of the second project again. Alternatively allocating the same energy to bring the first project to the maximum point might be wise at sixty, somewhat at forty, and at twenty rather not the wiser choice at a 50/50 fork.
My advice – but that’s precisely why so many of us here have such different views, so no one has to take my advice as the only option for lack of choice – in this situation is: weigh carefully and dose sparingly how much optimization should still be invested in house one.
Yes, it is entirely justified to doubt that it would come as surely as amen in church if I consider it likely that the OP a) will fare better with "learning house now, permanent house later" and b) will still be ready to make the leap to the second stage under 30.