When I read this again, I often ask myself why anyone builds with property developers at all. Usually, one makes the investment of their life and ends up heavily in debt, often to a borderline extent, only to accept what the well-meaning developer kindly grants you. For that amount of money, I somehow would not want to accept such a take-it-or-leave-it approach.
The considerate developer builds exactly what sells like hot cakes: a Golf with only those extras ordered by more than a third of customers. This satisfactorily covers the needs of the classic developer row house clientele.
That customers currently end up with developer offers that do not correspond to their desired profile due to the market situation is not the developers’ fault. It is also not practical to respond to this by generally taking Tourans as base models instead of Golfs.
A common trigger for moving into one’s own home is the approaching “delivery date” of child number 2 – when the child starts kindergarten, the house should be finished. Currently, searching for a plot often takes longer than expected, but you can hardly freeze a pregnant woman. So taking an interim house is a good solution.
I only see the mistake where the interim house is not seen as such and there is an attempt at all costs to turn it into the optimal house, no matter how inefficient and unsatisfactory the outcome.