Skepticism regarding ETICS on new multi-family residential buildings

  • Erstellt am 2015-03-06 22:02:01

Bauexperte

2015-03-09 12:21:03
  • #1
Sure I know him; he's too militant for me. Apart from that, the abbreviation KF can stand for many things ;)

Rhineland greetings
 

Mycraft

2015-03-09 12:22:21
  • #2
No no... KF can only stand for one thing :) at least in a thread about insulation...
 

Bauexperte

2015-03-09 12:27:00
  • #3
That's true again .... just came from the dentist; probably affecting my logical thinking :oops:

Rhenish greetings
 

Voki1

2015-03-09 12:57:56
  • #4
@DerBjoe

How much I would like to respond here in detail (*sigh*). But I simply don't have the time. Also, the entire discussion tends to go in circles a bit. I count the owners of such houses among supporters (even those who basically have no idea about it) and the avoiders as opponents.

I find the reading "Background / February 2014 Hexabromocyclododecane - Answers to Frequently Asked Questions" by the Federal Environment Agency quite interesting.



Surely a rather cute understatement of the actual problem. ;)
 

DerBjoern

2015-03-09 13:15:31
  • #5


It is definitely not a downplaying. HBCD is definitely not unproblematic. However, it is firmly bound in the EPS and does not simply dissolve from it to enter the environment. Furthermore, nothing remains of the HBCD after combustion. It is certainly not completely unproblematic, but panic is even less appropriate!



I count the opponents of such houses as avoiders (especially those who basically have no idea about it). ;)
 

Bauexperte

2015-03-09 15:41:14
  • #6
This discussion will always stir up emotions; for me, it is also hazardous waste. What supports this designation is that brominated insulation materials "must" be disposed of thermally to prevent harm to the environment. However, it is also true that—if processed carefully—no danger can arise for humans and animals; as long as the WDVS casing is not damaged. Interesting in all this discussion: a classic WDVS is initially cheap. Later, however, it becomes expensive because it is quite time-consuming to remove such insulation from the facade. From my subjective point of view, the question therefore arises as to why not just spend more money upfront and use natural insulation materials? Rhenish regards
 

Similar topics
14.06.2011New building: Which insulation is appropriate?14
07.09.2012Single-layer masonry vs. double-layer masonry with ETICS19
10.07.2011Wall construction and insulation for Kfw 70 house, okay?19
31.01.2012Plan stones behind ETICS, plan stone variant or joint masonry, costs13
28.10.201236 cm Ytong exterior wall, solid construction, mold formation, insulation37
22.09.2012Insulating prefabricated house with additional insulation, DIY, inexpensive styrofoam19
08.11.2012Insulation in the 70s compared to today, modern insulation, heating costs26
19.11.2014Topic: Facade Insulation37
18.08.2016New construction with sand-lime brick + ETICS - Criticism?!32
16.03.2021Ventilated, suspended facade instead of ETICS?29
27.03.201724 cm Ytong + insulation or 36.5 cm Ytong63
06.04.2017Construction method: 36.5 cm aerated concrete or 17.5 cm + 14 cm external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS)37
10.11.2017Hollow bricks and mineral insulation unfavorable?18
15.11.2018Is it reasonable to use material for the exterior wall without insulation?11
08.05.2019Aerated concrete or sand-lime brick with external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS) made of polystyrene29
05.01.2020Window - Installation / Insulation / Sealing / Execution16
20.02.2021Exterior wall for KFW 40 (+) with or without ETICS?86
18.04.2021Subsequent installation of a roller shutter in ETICS26
15.06.2023VHF vs WDVS facade - 1970 old building concrete/brick15
24.01.2023New construction - Is insulation worthwhile? Experiences?25

Oben