Skepticism regarding ETICS on new multi-family residential buildings

  • Erstellt am 2015-03-06 22:02:01

Voki1

2015-03-10 10:26:37
  • #1
Well, a forum lives from exchange. This also includes opinions, fears, hopes, and many other things that move people. Sometimes these are facts that seem incredibly obvious to oneself.

In any case, I am of the opinion that reading and informing oneself helps a lot. I was already aware that you built your house accordingly. And you will also have your (good) reasons for this. But it is perfectly fine if one does not get lulled by reports from manufacturer-appointed experts and similarly scales down exaggerated fears from fundamentalist chemistry opponents to the necessary measure. In the end, as so often, a feeling remains about what is right for oneself. And living has a lot to do with a good feeling.

But I am impressed by "...I am an engineer in another field, but certainly able to understand and calculate technical/physical/chemical properties. When you yourself calculate certain things like water vapor diffusion of building materials, or deal with chemical separation processes of HBCD with polymer chains,..." and sustainably so.
 

DerBjoern

2015-03-10 10:34:01
  • #2


No, you are not. You are simply trying to make me ridiculous because what I wrote does not correspond to your "belief."
It's a shame that such discussions always have to drift into the personal despite the stated desire for objectivity.
 

Bauexperte

2015-03-10 14:25:46
  • #3

Well ... don't read more into it than what's there; lawyers generally tend to have quite a dry sense of humor :D The sentence by voki can also easily be understood exactly as it is written ;)

Rhenish greetings
 

EveundGerd

2015-03-10 14:34:54
  • #4


True.
 

Voki1

2015-03-10 18:56:57
  • #5


Exactly. I tend not to write ambiguous sentences, even when I don't want to commit myself. ;)
 
Oben