haus2022
2020-01-18 18:22:09
- #1
Development plan/restrictions
~1200 m2
Slope facing north (approx. 1.5 m on the property and approx. 1.5 m embankment on the neighboring property) and east
Terrain adjustment to the northern neighbor basically possible
Access via the cul-de-sac on the narrow east side
4 or 10 m distance as in the attachment
2 floors
Allowed living space 271 m2
Builders' requirements
Country house style, gable roof
Generous floor plan
Basement, ground floor, and upper floor
2 adults, 2 toddlers + possibly 1 to 2 children in the future
2 children's rooms with wet room
Apartment <40 m2
Floors separable for maximum flexibility
Installations in shaft and pre-wall
Open kitchen, cooking island
Fireplace
Open garage or carport
Elevator shaft planned
House design
Who created the design:
- Do-it-Yourself
Price estimate: 800,000
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 900,000
Preferred heating technology: geothermal energy, trench collector
If you have to do without, on which details/extensions
- you can do without: balconies, wet rooms of the children's rooms, one or the other corner of the house
- you cannot do without: elevator shaft, fireplace
Why is the design the way it is now?
The property is in a good urban location. Therefore, the allowed building density should be used almost completely. Floors should be easily separable. Renting as apartments should be possible without major renovations if necessary.
It would be obvious to place the house as far north and east as possible. However, this would completely block the southern flank of the northern neighbor. This has already been proposed by planners, but is excluded on my part. In return, the neighbor is willing to make terrain changes on their property if necessary. Placement of the house to the west is difficult to implement because of the prescribed boundary distances, as the property becomes narrower. A terraced house placed entirely to the west would be conceivable but is not desired.
I am fully aware that the design is suboptimal in some respects. I am therefore grateful for any criticism, comments, and suggestions.
~1200 m2
Slope facing north (approx. 1.5 m on the property and approx. 1.5 m embankment on the neighboring property) and east
Terrain adjustment to the northern neighbor basically possible
Access via the cul-de-sac on the narrow east side
4 or 10 m distance as in the attachment
2 floors
Allowed living space 271 m2
Builders' requirements
Country house style, gable roof
Generous floor plan
Basement, ground floor, and upper floor
2 adults, 2 toddlers + possibly 1 to 2 children in the future
2 children's rooms with wet room
Apartment <40 m2
Floors separable for maximum flexibility
Installations in shaft and pre-wall
Open kitchen, cooking island
Fireplace
Open garage or carport
Elevator shaft planned
House design
Who created the design:
- Do-it-Yourself
Price estimate: 800,000
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 900,000
Preferred heating technology: geothermal energy, trench collector
If you have to do without, on which details/extensions
- you can do without: balconies, wet rooms of the children's rooms, one or the other corner of the house
- you cannot do without: elevator shaft, fireplace
Why is the design the way it is now?
The property is in a good urban location. Therefore, the allowed building density should be used almost completely. Floors should be easily separable. Renting as apartments should be possible without major renovations if necessary.
It would be obvious to place the house as far north and east as possible. However, this would completely block the southern flank of the northern neighbor. This has already been proposed by planners, but is excluded on my part. In return, the neighbor is willing to make terrain changes on their property if necessary. Placement of the house to the west is difficult to implement because of the prescribed boundary distances, as the property becomes narrower. A terraced house placed entirely to the west would be conceivable but is not desired.
I am fully aware that the design is suboptimal in some respects. I am therefore grateful for any criticism, comments, and suggestions.