Question regarding the feasibility of financing

  • Erstellt am 2020-05-09 02:03:05

Maschi33

2020-05-09 09:05:45
  • #1
I think here again a wrong assumption is being made from the outset. With 5k (household) net income, one is anything but a high earner in a large part of the country. Especially not in regions where the price per sqm of building land is 800€ and upwards. If you are completely honest with yourself and look deep inside, you will realize that as a slightly above-average earning ordinary citizen, you simply cannot afford a new build costing 600-700k there, unless a substantial amount of equity is available through inheritance or gift. The ordinary citizen with the above-mentioned salary can perhaps contribute 100k equity with a lot of sacrifice and discipline. That is barely enough for the incidental costs there.
 

HilfeHilfe

2020-05-09 09:18:03
  • #2
Correct, with 5k net income from two earners, you are the poor schlucker when buying property in Munich and Emperor Franz in Schleswig-Holstein.
 

HilfeHilfe

2020-05-09 09:19:40
  • #3
And I don’t understand your thread. What are you looking for? Information, sympathy, justice? Enlighten us? Are you actively searching and want a comprehensive clarification of the finances? Then please post
 

kbt09

2020-05-09 09:31:37
  • #4
... you always have to ask exactly when someone talks about 800 TEuro +/-. What was always included. Because 800 TEuro for a 150 sqm house without land are even around Munich really high numbers that I can't understand.

Prices of pears are too often given when you ask for apples .
 

hampshire

2020-05-09 09:50:22
  • #5
Yes, Ingolstadt is significantly more expensive than most other regions in Germany. Orientation towards Munich might make it look different. In my impression, most houses of the builders here in the forum are built in a "commuter belt." Even as an individual, 5000€ per month is not yet a high income, although it is already on the right downward slope of the distribution curve. I do not find that steep – however, as others have already mentioned in the thread, it must be taken into account that house costs consist of more than just one installment. Theoretically you are right, only the idea of no extra burden is an illusion. Anyway – the reason why the average wealth of people in countries we call "poorer" is sometimes significantly higher than in Germany is the homeownership rate. In that respect, your consideration is basically correct. We are often not willing to sacrifice a certain "standard," such as several vacations a year, for wealth accumulation, stay rented, and in doing so, first live quite well. This consumption behavior helps the economy splendidly; whether it helps society too – I put a big question mark on that.
 

AleXSR700

2020-05-09 11:16:15
  • #6
First of all :
If my question somehow offends you, I am sorry. But I don’t know why. I think I asked kindly for help with my general considerations. And that’s all I am looking for so far. I will be more specific when a purchase is in sight. Our net income is also above 5k.

@ Everyone else:
Thank you very much for your lively participation.
I should definitely qualify my wording: not high earners, but better earners and the upper 15%.
I also didn’t mean that I personally consider myself a high earner, but I know many who earn around 3500 € net.
And if we assume a slightly different distribution, for example 3500 € for one and 1500-2000 € for the other, then the one earning 3500 € as a single still has to pay the solidarity surcharge because statistically he belongs to the "top 10%" of earners, as politics have told us. One would spontaneously think that these are the people who can pay for the 800,000 to 1,000,000 houses.
Because if not, who pays for the many, many houses here that all start at 1 million?

But that’s just why it surprised me so much how low one should calculate.
But you have the experience, and that’s why I am very glad that you respond to me so actively. It takes away the illusions that build up through the chatter of others. And that one thinks one can justify mathematically.

By the way, I also tell everyone that I wouldn’t want to spend all my money on repayment, but actually think that one should calculate much more conservatively for children, vacations with children, sports, maybe later university for the children.

You confirm my suspicion and destroy my hopes.
 

Similar topics
04.11.2009Taking a loan for equity financing?19
28.03.2011Can we afford to build a house without equity?14
20.07.2011House construction: Equity / incidental construction costs realistic?14
03.04.2012Buying a house without equity?29
30.04.2012No equity, good income, financing feasible?22
26.08.2012Small single-family house, little equity but good income, is it at all feasible?11
14.11.2012KfW loan as equity capital - Who knows this financing?10
19.03.2013General questions about equity and construction costs10
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
20.06.2013Problems with equity - real estate purchase15
29.08.2013Calculate equity and financing12
27.02.2015Financing plan: high equity / 2.67% / 15 years / full repayment15
14.01.2014Different share/equity for construction. How to write it firmly?10
16.01.2014Problems with bank - equity10
20.02.2014Equity - Reserve for Unexpected44
17.06.2014House purchase planned at the beginning of 2015 - No equity41
02.08.2014Does the bank require our own equity when taking out a loan?11
21.08.2014Is financing without equity realistic?19
04.09.2014How to use equity14
05.10.2014Building a house without equity26

Oben