Please do not dream that this would mean that later cables would be easypeasy to retrofit!
Today we had another initial consultation in which we also touched on the topic of the "installation layer." For us, the installation layer is mainly about being able to hang pictures and cabinets on the exterior wall without hesitation and also being able to add new sockets, etc., in the future if needed.
It's clear to us that this won't be easy peasy because of the installation layer—but we thought this layer would make it possible in the first place.
However, yesterday the statement was made that an installation layer is not necessary for that at all. It's important to ensure that there is no membrane ("vapor barrier") installed in the exterior wall but, for example, a fleece ("vapor retarder"). If a vapor retarder is installed, it doesn't matter at all whether it is pierced by new sockets, nails, or whatever. In plain terms, with a vapor retarder, an installation layer is not necessary (almost pointless). The reasoning didn't seem far-fetched.
Would you agree with that?
Yes, I preferably recommend design, execution planning, tendering, and construction management all from the same source. Of course, the tendering is not only about materials, quantities, and measures but also about execution time windows and price binding periods. I don't know who keeps putting this nonsense in the prospective builder's head that price guarantees only exist with the general contractor (GC).
Thanks—that's very interesting to read. The price period probably starts earlier with the GC—namely with the signature—but you are not completely at the mercy of price increases with the architect either. Are all trades tendered simultaneously by the architect? Or is this done gradually as needed?
There is nothing surprising about apples and pears being uneven in size: the architect means the whole money and the turnkey provider (regardless of type) only the money you want to give them (i.e., whether you get some cash from grandma for the owner-built items). Also, these are premarital promises from used car dealers, and you shouldn't believe them too much. They don't care whether you have to sell the house later to pay for it. They have often experienced that the one with the sweetest promises gets the contract. They don't use your bathroom—so they couldn't care less if you downgrade the tiles again to save the budget.
So, we planned with both including additional construction costs and kitchen. But we are still waiting for the first draft from the architect. He said then he could already give us a closer cost estimate (of course still rough).
For that, take a look at "Changing a floor plan in size," where I explained this in detail.
It was less about that not always being easy but more about that with all providers who only offer catalog houses, you can be lucky if one of the houses fits well on the plot. But if not, it becomes disproportionately expensive with these providers. At least that's our experience/feeling.