Winniefred
2021-08-20 18:37:15
- #1
That sounds more like a higher-quality building, not one for workers or the like. To me, it sounds like a pretty little house. If not much has been done so far, you’ll have to do a full renovation anyway.
Our basement was built as a damp cellar. In those construction years, basements weren’t supposed to be dry because they were used as storage rooms with high humidity. You can dry something like that with a lot of effort or just leave it as is; we decided on the latter for now. At first, we didn’t open our ceilings, but this year in February, just out of curiosity, we opened one room and were rather positively surprised. Everything completely dry, solidly built, with much thicker beams than previously assumed. The building shell had been solidly renovated in the 90s, so we left it as it was; so far, we have replaced almost all the windows, insulated the roof, mostly redone the interior plaster, completely redone plumbing, electricity, and bathrooms, and interior doors. We removed some old contaminants, ugly wooden paneling from the 70s and such. Beautiful wooden stairs were uncovered again. We had no nasty surprises; apparently, our house was always well maintained.
What you’re planning is not a renovation; it’s a renovation/restoration. If you want everything to meet new-build standards, it will be expensive, that’s a forewarning. We never aimed for that. For a house with 100m2 and the mentioned renovations mostly done by ourselves (except plumbing, electricity, and tiles), we have roughly spent 80,000€ so far. Of course, you could have sunk 200,000€, but we didn’t find that necessary at all. We have lived here for 4 years and pay 45€ for gas, 63 for electricity. So our house is certainly not an energy guzzler.
Our basement was built as a damp cellar. In those construction years, basements weren’t supposed to be dry because they were used as storage rooms with high humidity. You can dry something like that with a lot of effort or just leave it as is; we decided on the latter for now. At first, we didn’t open our ceilings, but this year in February, just out of curiosity, we opened one room and were rather positively surprised. Everything completely dry, solidly built, with much thicker beams than previously assumed. The building shell had been solidly renovated in the 90s, so we left it as it was; so far, we have replaced almost all the windows, insulated the roof, mostly redone the interior plaster, completely redone plumbing, electricity, and bathrooms, and interior doors. We removed some old contaminants, ugly wooden paneling from the 70s and such. Beautiful wooden stairs were uncovered again. We had no nasty surprises; apparently, our house was always well maintained.
What you’re planning is not a renovation; it’s a renovation/restoration. If you want everything to meet new-build standards, it will be expensive, that’s a forewarning. We never aimed for that. For a house with 100m2 and the mentioned renovations mostly done by ourselves (except plumbing, electricity, and tiles), we have roughly spent 80,000€ so far. Of course, you could have sunk 200,000€, but we didn’t find that necessary at all. We have lived here for 4 years and pay 45€ for gas, 63 for electricity. So our house is certainly not an energy guzzler.