Land prices and standard land value and tips for land search

  • Erstellt am 2021-05-24 14:53:23

Benny85

2021-05-25 20:21:53
  • #1
New development areas would be great, but there are none at the moment. Infill development is the policy here, following the motto, there are enough building gaps, the market should regulate that. You can’t hope for mitigation from the municipalities here. In one of the places where we would like to go, new municipal building land is supposedly going to be developed soon, but it’s only about a few parcels and it’s already foreseeable that only families with children will get something there (to whom I gladly give priority), plus it could still take a while. Of course, we can still apply...
 

Benny85

2021-05-25 20:41:18
  • #2
No, we were not there. Because there was nothing, as I wrote. On foot there would have been nothing either. So it was a waste of time, on foot it would have been double the waste of time. No one demanded that, but for me it is definitely necessary to be perceived as someone who fits into the village. I can approach people and ask if the owner of the free neighboring property is known and whether they might sell. If there is sympathy, I might even invite the potential future neighbor for a beer in the village pub, and if he actually became a neighbor, I could invite him for a joint barbecue in the garden. What I cannot do is pretend that I am already his neighbor. That is what matters to me. Maybe. But that’s how it came across.
 

Jean-Marc

2021-05-25 20:47:34
  • #3


There are still building plots available in Verl-Kaunitz, also in Delbrück-Schöning and Lippling, a new development area is planned in Hövelhof-Riege... are you up to date?
 

K1300S

2021-05-25 20:57:47
  • #4
Maybe it's also a question of flexibility? ;)
 

11ant

2021-05-25 20:59:23
  • #5

If I remember correctly, there was a deadline last year or the year before before which development plans could be simplified. A lot was pushed through then – preferably infill development plans (to regulate the activation of backyard building plots). In the latter, in my opinion, predominantly unfortunate planning frameworks were created (pipe-head-shaped plots, sometimes only site area instead of own street access, less number of floors / floor area ratio / eaves height than in the first row or in neighboring new development areas).

You did write ...

... so you were there after all (?) – are you sure you would "see" vacancies?
 

Benny85

2021-05-25 21:12:17
  • #6
By "there" I mean where I am supposed to be to show I belong here. I wasn’t there, after all, I was looking for that place and didn’t find it. Maybe I express myself unclearly... What I’m getting at is, I wrote that I searched for vacancies by car, and then I was accused of not doing it on foot. I definitely won’t be walking 50 km through residential areas just to be "there" and "present," I first need to find the interesting spots for myself. And yes, you can recognize vacancies from a moving car. The first clues are missing curtains and a wild front garden.
 
Oben