kati1337
2022-10-17 16:12:36
- #1
I always see it as an investment because I think a certain monthly expense X for housing is simply unavoidable. Therefore, I prefer to invest this expense in something that truly belongs to me after paying off the loan. Even if the property probably will not increase in value but rather have decreased, it is still better to have a value in hand at the end of the monthly "housing costs." It is simply without alternative; you don’t live rent-free just by renting either. I am quite familiar with the profitability calculations for homeownership, and I even acknowledge that renting while regularly investing elsewhere, such as in a global market fund, can be significantly more profitable after 30 years. Against this, for me, stand two major risks with the "rent + invest elsewhere" idea: - often, the idea remains just on paper. The reality is usually that one rents and consumes the difference to the potential loan rate instead of building capital - "Stone remains," while money, for example, could lose massive value in a possible hyperinflation. Of course, other catastrophe scenarios are conceivable where everyone is expropriated and who knows what else, but those are probably much less likely.I just always find the word "invest" a bit questionable. To me, an investment is something that clearly appreciates in value, allowing me to realize a real profit and ideally "produces" money. A house in which I have to invest a lot of money just to maintain its value is not, in my personal opinion, an investment. If I calculate a 25-year term with, for example, an ETF starting investment of 80k plus 400€ monthly, I end up with over 400k in assets at the end. Yes, it's a simple calculation, but whether this is possible with a house with a similar amount of money spent, I really doubt.