chand1986
2018-03-20 11:32:44
- #1
You can either take your life into your own hands while still young, or keep all options open until 35 and miss out on some things.
So "taking your life into your own hands" and "keeping options open" are opposites? Bold claim... I assert the exact opposite. And now?
You always miss out on something because you can't do unlimited things at the same time and the day only has 24 hours. So the question is not what you miss out on (almost everything), but whether what you don’t miss out on is what you want.
If you have a plot of land, no obligation to build, and are young, the pragmatic approach—already mentioned by many here—is to rent first. If the relationship is strong enough to survive building a house, it won’t break because of renting an apartment. You can also have children in rental apartments without anything bad happening. Many other advantages (the word "living experience" was mentioned, and besides flexibility, it’s the most important) also arise.
Conclusion: Even if you could already build a house, and even if you assume that the partnership is stable and will lead to children, renting for now is still highly recommended. You keep all options open; the only loss is the lack of living time in a house, which you might build differently with a few more years of experience. And a few years is a very small price for preserving many options.
I clearly advise: Rent first, keep the plot as an investment, and absolutely don’t build anything to rent out on it. It has very few disadvantages but many advantages, as described above.
And something still needs to be said about a fear-monger
Then usually comes the "closing gates syndrome" :)
The exact opposite happens just as often: Midlife crisis, because (mainly the gentlemen) feel they have to make up for missed opportunities, since they "had" to start a family in their mid-twenties (perhaps to spare their partner the "closing gates panic"?).
You always have to live in the way that suits you, not how others do!