Pretty off-topic but the OP seems to have checked out. I’ll summarize: 1. Ownership entails obligations. A single-family house with a garden requires more work than a condominium. Generally, real estate for personal use is a matter of preference. If my next job is 500 km away in 6 months, I’m hardly going to tie myself to a single-family house for the kids. 2. Theory and practice: Yes, someone who finances/buys and does not rent will usually spend more money than someone who lives in a rental. In terms of importance, it is also higher for him/her. I doubt that renting a house causes significantly less 'work' than owning one. (Which tenant would voluntarily outsource the gardener and winter service for 300€ per month via the additional costs – few.) You still have to clean the professional who performs the annual heating maintenance and coordinate appointments. Nevertheless, the obligation to make the monthly loan repayments already leads to asset accumulation, since quite a few would otherwise spend this money on other things and NOT invest long-term. If most people acted rationally, we wouldn’t have our current consumer society with credit cards and the like – look at the USA. In the end, owning a property is many things and nothing. Investment, consumption, commitment, freedom. Take your pick;)