ypg
2022-01-10 10:24:37
- #1
I think the data (heights) will fit (except for the budget). While reading, I thought: well, even if adults don’t like slants, you can still give the children nice rooms under the roof. But then I also thought that the roof terrace does make some sense if you live on the upper floor and give the garden to the seniors. But I only see the roof terrace being used by the children. I don’t know if it’s really used like that. Also the gallery… that’s a cozy area for the children, but a no-go zone for adults ;) To sort it out for you (apart from the floor plan): You’re giving up a larger footprint so there is still some garden left, but then you don’t really have anything from the garden, or the remaining piece of garden now has to be maintained by the seniors. Does that make sense? Basically, it’s going to be a two-family house and remain a two-family house. A little bit of garden share for some parking spaces and that’s it. Then it is assumed that the 30-year-olds have the same living needs as the seniors over 70. The seniors’ apartment is nice, but I find the 8-seater dining table somewhat out of place and too large. The bedroom is a bit cramped. A small dining table makes sense in the kitchen. Guests can be accommodated more cheaply and with more privacy in a hotel. For “later,” the bedroom partition wall could be removed… But: I want to throw another suggestion into the ring: Increase the footprint after all, put a kitchen-living area, WC, and utility room on the ground floor for the young family, then adjust the upper floor on the footprint with a small living room and children’s room. The bedroom will probably also fit there. Just as an example in a sketch (without binding measurements or anything, just as a rough size indication)
