I summarize: 1) we are talking about a completely different object and also project than in 2019. 2) I at least overlooked, a. whether you want to move into house L or house R and b. where the profile of the co-builders/buyers/tenants (?) of the other half would be. 3) House L is 80 cm higher than house R. 4) otherwise both houses are substantially, but not completely mirror-image identical. Many "modules" of the floor plans are the same in both houses. Through this runs a common thread of planning in plenty of botched-work pockets. 5) Variant 1 only has the height offset, in variant 2 the halves are also shifted against each other in depth (three eighth meters). 6) in variant 2 house L also recesses behind the carport, in variant 1 it does not. 7) in variant 1 both halves have equally sized children's rooms, in variant 2 those of house L are significantly larger. 8) the roof terrace of house L is only much larger in variant 1 and very much larger in variant 2.
Without further explanations, much of this is still not quite clear. Overall, the design (not only because of the air spaces) appears very much like it fell out of a time machine, I have seen similar things in large numbers forty years ago. Both design variants raise the question of what kind of special treatment regarding the access roads is being anticipated here: the parking situation only really works under the (questionably approved) conditions of almost completely adjacent crossing possibilities as well as an access road in the curve. Given the general trend to approve 1x 2.50 m per house (and access roads in curves are regularly not approved at all), I mark both with big question marks.
Exactly, it is a different project than 2019, which was from a developer. We have now bought a plot ourselves and would like to move into the left half. So far, there is no neighbor for the other half yet. Therefore, we are still completely free regarding the planning.
The 80 cm height difference was our wish to loosen up the whole thing a bit with the offset of the buildings. However, this is not yet fixed. What are “botched-work pockets”?
The different floor plans in the staggered floor were once juxtaposed by the architect for illustrative reasons. We also tend rather to the variant with the dressing room, whereby the roof terrace would considerably shrink.
What exactly do you mean by “fell out of a time machine”?