11ant
2023-02-15 19:35:30
- #1
Just a year ago, the seller would have been pleased, since for every person giving back there was a rich selection of successors who would have immediately paid him about twenty percent more. But that wind has changed, and since the reasons for withdrawal lie entirely on your side, he has no reason to be lenient. But that’s not bad for you, that this withdrawal would be economically unattractive. That way, your anxiety won’t get in your way.No, no obligation to build with him, only the requirement from the city within 3 years after development. So without the consent of the developer, who will most likely refuse, there is no cheap option. Then the option is basically off the table
I’m glad. So I’m not such a forum troublemaker after all, as lets "hint at" in his ingratitude speech today ;-) Under which circumstances and following which procedure an architect and then a general contractor can be a good way would certainly be beyond the scope here. The most frequent royal road from my point of view (architect with bidding to which GCs may also gladly participate, and construction management then with the same architect who was already the planner) is still no universal tool or all-purpose solution. It’s different in every single case, but still quickly recognizable with experience. And I’m no Miraculix, you’ll get your magic potion recipe printed out ;-) Afterwards you will be amazed how easy it was (maybe you still know the commercial with Boris for AOL).Yes, precisely because of your articles and comments here in the forum, I started reconsidering again; before that, the variant with architect and general contractor was actually the clear favorite