Attach to property access planning

I have the solution in mind as I have already drawn it,

Yes, sure, free parking spaces are of course also possible ...

Uncertainty is due to the retaining wall or later approval of a garage or carports.

... but which later carports are you talking about – where are they supposed to go?

One (1) carport, where the two vehicles are parked. I would have to check to what extent a boundary garage is feasible in terms of costs, size, etc. Regards Anson

One (1) carport, where the two vehicles are parked.

You probably mean the grey ones, so the Q5 and the (narrower) Sprinter. I interpret the intentions of the development plan rather in the direction of choosing a place for a garage or a carport within the building envelope, which is only extended in width up to the boundary. Otherwise, I consider the property to require an architect, i.e., "or draftsman" is not sufficient.

how one designates or names this which is a matter of taste, and it is also clear that an architect has to draw the whole thing, I am not aware of anyone who has created/sketched their building application themselves and got through it without difficulties.

Regards Anson

It is about the fact that it really should be an architect who thinks about the house/garage/carport. And not just a draftsman clerk of the general contractor, who places a standard house from their own range on a plot of land and slaps a basement underneath.

The preliminary draft is unfortunately unsuitable with regard to the garage. The plot is too small for a switchback.

if I were to set the house deeper, the house builder would refuse because of the moisture (solid wood house).

He refuses because the concrete builder would then earn more and he himself less.
Park the cars below and build a hillside elevator for heavy loads and in case it becomes necessary to transport yourself.
A hillside with a view is brilliant. Have a new draft made. The first one is unfortunately no good.